Advertisement

The Literature/Screen Debate: an Overview

  • Robert Giddings
  • Keith Selby
  • Chris Wensley
Part of the Insights book series

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the critical debate concerning the transfer of novels into television and film drama. The major issues are outlined and discussed, with particular reference to the adaptation or dramatization1 of prose fiction into the medium of film and television. The majority of the issues discussed refer equally to film and television, since the concern is generally with the ‘visualization’ of the prose text; however, certain differences between the two visual media will become evident.

Keywords

Subsequent Performance Screen Image Television Adaptation Film Theory Film Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Lewis Jacobs, The Rise of the American Film (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1939), p. 119.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Joseph Conrad, Preface to The Nigger of the ‘Narcissus’ (London: Dent, 1897).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Herbert Read, A Coat of Many Colours (London: Routledge, 1945), pp. 230–31.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Morris Beja, Film and Literature (New York: Longman, 1976).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    William Luhr and Peter Lehman, Authorship and Narrative in the Cinema (New York: Putnam, 1977), p. 291.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Boris Tomashevsky, ‘Thematics’, in Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, trans. Lemon and Reis (Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1965), p. 68.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    George Bluestone, Novel into Film (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957), p. 2.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Bertolt Brecht, ‘The Film, the Novel and the Epic Theatre’, in Brecht on Theatre, trans. John Willett (London: Eyre Methuen, 1978), p. 47.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    J. Dudley Andrew, Concepts in Film Theory (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 104.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Eric Rentschier (ed.), German Film and Literature (London: Methuen, 1986), p. 5.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Martin Esslin, The Field of Drama (London: Methuen, 1987), p. 36.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Jonathan Miller, Subsequent Performances (London: Faber, 1986), p. 66.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    For more detailed analysis, see Martin Esslin, The Field of Drama, op. cit., and Peter Wollen, Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (London: Secker and Warburg, 1972).Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Sergei Eisenstein, ‘Dickens, Griffith and the Film Today’, in Film Form, trans. Jay Leyda (New York, 1949; London: Dobson, 1951), pp. 195–255.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Joseph Frank, The Widening Gyre (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1963), pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Bruce Morissette, Novel and Film (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), p. 15.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    Keith Cohen, Film and Literature: the Dynamics of Exchange (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), p. 4.Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    Robert Scholes, ‘Narration and Narrativity in Film’, in Quarterly Review of Film Studies, 1:111 (August 1976), p. 291.Google Scholar
  19. 27.
    Leon Edel, ‘Novel and Camera’, in J. Halperin (ed.), The Theory of the Novel (London: Oxford University Press, 1974), p. 182.Google Scholar
  20. 28.
    Brian McFarlane, Words and Images (London: Secker, 1987), p. 2.Google Scholar
  21. 32.
    George Linden, ‘The Storied World’, in Fred H. Marcus (ed.), Film and Literature: Contrasts in Media (New York: Chandler, 1971), p. 169.Google Scholar
  22. 34.
    Michael Klein and Gillian Parker (eds), The English Novel and the Movies (New York: Ungar, 1981), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  23. 35.
    Geoffrey Wagner, The Novel and the Cinema (Rutherford, New Jersey: Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 1975), pp. 222–31.Google Scholar
  24. 37.
    Keith Cohen, ‘Eisenstein’s Subversive Adaptation’, in G. Peary and R. Shatzkin (eds), The Classic American Novel and the Movies (New York: Ungar, 1977), pp. 245 and 255.Google Scholar
  25. 41.
    Joseph Boggs, The Art of Watching Films (Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishers, 1985).Google Scholar
  26. 45.
    Colin MacCabe, ‘Realism and the Cinema: Notes on Some Brechtian Theses’, in Screen, Summer 1974, Vol. 15, Pt 2, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  27. 51.
    George Linden, ‘The Storied World’, in J. Harrington (ed.) Film And/As Literature (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977).Google Scholar
  28. 58.
    Virginia Woolf, ‘The Movies and Reality’, in New Republic, XLVII (4 August 1926), p. 309.Google Scholar
  29. 64.
    Thomas Craven, ‘The Great American Art’, in Dial, LXXXI (December 1926), pp. 489–90.Google Scholar
  30. 72.
    See William Jinks, The Celluloid Literature (London: Glencoe Press, 1971), pp. 116–34.Google Scholar
  31. 73.
    Lester Asheim, From Book to Film, PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago, 1949.Google Scholar
  32. 76.
    John Ellis, ‘The Literary Adaptation’, in Screen, Vol. 23, May/June, 1982, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 81.
    J. M. Wober, Television and Reading (London: IBA, 1985).Google Scholar
  34. 82.
    J. M. Wober, Fiction and Depiction (London: IBA, April 1980). Titles used were Wuthering Heights; Rebecca; Nicholas Nickleby; The Stars Look Down; The Forsyte Saga; From Here to Eternity; The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie; I, Claudius; Rich Man, Poor Man; War and Peace; Anna Karenina; The Mayor of Casterbridge; Clayhanger; Murder Most English; People Like Us.Google Scholar
  35. 85.
    Jane Austen, Northanger Abbey (1818), 1983 edition (London: Macmillan Education) p. 22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editorial Board, Lumiere (Co-operative) Press Ltd 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Giddings
  • Keith Selby
  • Chris Wensley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations