Advertisement

Prophetic Pragmatism: Cultural Criticism and Political Engagement

  • Cornel West
Part of the Language, Discourse, Society book series

Abstract

The move from Rorty’s model of fluid conversation to that of the multi-leveled operations of power leads us back to Ralph Waldo Emerson. Like Friedrich Nietzsche, Emerson is first and foremost a cultural critic obsessed with ways to generate forms of power. For Rorty, these forms are understood as activities of conversation for the primary purpose of producing new human self-descriptions. But for Emerson, conversation is but one minor instance of the myriad of possible transactions for the enhancement of human powers and personalities. Ironically, Rorty’s adoption of Michael Oakeshott’s metaphor of “conversation” reflects the dominant ideal of the very professionalism he criticizes. This ideal indeed is more a public affair than are Emerson’s preferred ideal transactions, e.g., gardening, walking, reading, and yet it also is more genteel and bourgeois.

Keywords

Moral Vision Political Engagement Political Praxis Marxist Theory Cultural Criticism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    Roberto Unger, Social Theory, Its Situation and Its Task: A Critical Introduction to Politics-A Work in Constructive Social Theory( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987 ), p. 41.Google Scholar
  2. 18.
    Richard Rorty, “Solidarity or Objectivity?” Post-Analytic Philosophy, ed. John Rajchman and Cornel West ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1985 ), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  3. 22.
    For a reading of Foucault that highlights this aspect of his work, see John Rajchman, Michel Foucault: The Freedom of Philosophy ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1985 ), pp. 103–8.Google Scholar
  4. 23.
    Michel Foucault, “Truth and Power,” Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, trans. Colin Gordon et al. ( New York: Pantheon Books, 1980 ), p. 117.Google Scholar
  5. 24.
    Michel Foucault, “The Subject and Power,” Critical Inquiry, 8, no. 1 (Summer 1982), 777, 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 26.
    Edward W. Said, The World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983), pp. 221, 222.Google Scholar
  7. 28.
    Raymond Williams, Modern Tragedy ( Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966 ), pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
  8. 29a.
    Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (New York: Seabury Press, 1975 ), pp. 245–341.Google Scholar
  9. 29b.
    Edward Shils, Tradition ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981 ).Google Scholar
  10. 31.
    Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith ( New York: International Publishers, 1971 ), p. 348.Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    Rosalind E. Krauss, The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths ( Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornel West
    • 1
  1. 1.Princeton UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations