Abstract
The use of animals in scientific experiments has been under fire from animal-welfare and anti-vivisection societies for more than a century. During that time, although there has been a steady decrease since 1976, the number of experiments conducted in Britain each year mushroomed from a few hundred to the present level of about three million. The Cruelty to Animals Act 1876, which effected some control of animal research, remained solidly in place for 111 years, despite the increasing difficulties experienced by the Home Office in applying it effectively to the nature and range of animal experiments and tests carried out in the late 20th century. Only when it became obvious that, as a result of political lobbying by the animal-welfare movement in the mid-1970s, new legislation was bound to be drafted, did the scientific community as a whole admit that a new law was needed to replace the old Act and begin to launch a damage-limitation exercise.
‘A true science cannot possibly ignore the solid incontrovertible fact, that the practice of vivisection is revolting to the human conscience, even among the ordinary members of a not over-sensitive society. The so-called “science” … which deliberately overlooks this fact, and confines its view to the material aspects of the problem, is not science at all, but a one-sided assertion of the views which find favour with a particular class of men.’
Henry Salt (1892). Animals’ Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress, p. 97
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AMRIC (1984). Animals in Medicines Research—Why? (leaflet), AMRIC, London
AMRIC (1987). Imagine What Life Would Be Like Without Animals (booklet for schools), AMRIC, London
AMRIC (undated). Animals in Medicines Research—Now Read the Facts (leaflet), AMRIC, London
Anon (1978). Royal Society President questions anti-science dogma, New Sci., 80, 748
ASAB and Animal Behavior Society (1981). Guidelines for the use of animals in research, Anim. Behav., 29, 1–2
ASE/IOB/UFAW (1986). The place of animals in education, Biologist, 33, 275–8
Barnes, D. J. (1985). A matter of change. In Singer. P. (ed.), In Defence of Animals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 157–67
Berliner, R. W. and Barger, A. C. (1986). Physiology and antivivisection, News Physiol. Sci., 1, 79–80
Biscoe, T. J. (1985). The use of animals in medical research, RDS Newsl. May, 2–3
British Psychological Society—Scientific Affairs Board (1979). Report of the Working Party on Animal Experimentation, Bull. Br. Psychol. Soc., 32, 44–52
British Psychological Society—Scientific Affairs Board (1985). Guidelines to the use of animals in research, Bull. Br. Psychol. Soc., 38, 289–91
Britt, D. (1984). Ethics, ethical committees and animal experimentation, Nature, 311, 503–6
CCCWA (1987). Report on a Visit to the Institute of Psychiatry, CCCWA, London
Clark, S. R. L. (1977). The Moral Status of Animals, Clarendon, Oxford
Delacôte, G. (1987). Science and scientists: public perception and attitudes. In Evered, D. and O’Connor, M. (eds), Communicating Science to the Public, John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 41–8
Diamond, C. (1981). Experimenting on animals: a problem in ethics. In Sperlinger, D. (ed). Animals in Research: New Perspectives in Animal Experimentation, John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 337–62
Dixon, B. (1976). What is Science For?, Penguin, London, p. 134
Fox, M. A. (1986a). The Case for Animal Experimentation: An Evolutionary and Ethical Perspective, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Fox, M. A. (1986b). Author reverses views on animal rights (letter), The Scientist, 15 December, 10
Fox, M. A. (1987). Arguing against animal research, The Whig Standard, Canada, 4 April, 5–7
Goodall, J. (1971). In The Shadow of Man, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
Goodall, J. (1987). Prisoners of science: chimpanzees in medical research, Bull. Psychol. Ethical Treatm. Anim., Spring, 2–5
Grigsby, P. and Maruyama, Y. (1981). Modification of the oral radiation death syndrome with combined WR-2721 and misonidazole, Br. J. Radiol., 54, 969–72
Grubb, R. L. (1987). Animal rights versus medical research, Neurosurg., 20, 809–10
Harrison, D. F. N. (1980). Editorial, Clin. Oncol., 6, 1–2
Heim, A. (1981). The desensitization of teachers and students. In Paterson, D. A. (ed). Humane Education—A Symposium, HEC, Sussex, pp. 37–45
Hoff, C. (1980). Immoral and moral uses of animals, New Engl. J. Med., 302, 115–18
Holden, C. (1987). Industry toxicologists keen on reducing animal use, Science, 236, 252
Home Office (1986/87). Personal correspondence with Clive Hollands
Home Office Advisory Committee (1979). Report on the LD50 Test, Home Office, London, p. 13
Huxley, A. (1983). Anniversary address by the President (of the Royal Society), R. Soc. News Suppl. 2, i–vii
ICRS Journal of Medical Science (1981). Six principles of humane animal experimentation—Editorial, ICRS J. Med. Sci., 9, 277–9
Iglehart, J. K. (1985). The use of animals in research, New Engl. J. Med., 313, 395–400
Kelly, J. A. (1986). Alternatives to aversive procedures with animals in the psychology teaching setting. In Fox, M. W. and Mickley, L. D. (eds), Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1985/86, HSUS, Washington, DC, p. 168
Langley, G. R. (1981). Animals in British universities. In Paterson, D. A. (ed.), Humane Education—A Symposium, HEC, Sussex, pp. 25–35
Marks, J. (1972). Ending the routine guinea pig test, Tubercle, 53, 31–4
Medawar, P. B. (1969). The Art of the Soluble, Pelican, London
Morley, D. (1978). The Sensitive Scientist: Report of a British Association Study Group, SCM, London, pp. 84–91
National Academy of Sciences (1985). Models for Biomedical Research, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Overcast, T. D. and Sales, B. D. (1985). Regulation of animal experimentation, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 254, 1944–9
Pascoe, J. E. (1983). Attitudes to Experimentation on Living Animals: Science, Ethics, Law, Physiological Society Education Sub-Committee
Paton, W. (1984). Man and Mouse: Animals in Medical Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Perkins, F. T. (1980). Risks and gains associated with vaccination, Dev. Biol. Standard., 46, 3–13
Research Defence Society (1982a). Diabetes: Research Triumphs (leaflet), RDS, London
Research Defence Society (1982b). Are Animal Experiments Necessary for Cosmetic Products? (leaflet), RDS, London
Rollin, B. E. (1981). Animal Rights and Human Morality, Prometheus Books, New York
Rosner, F. (1985). Is animal experimentation being threatened by animal rights groups?, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 254, 1942–3
Rowan, A. N. (1984). Of Mice, Models, and Men: A Critical Evaluation of Animal Research, State University of New York Press, New York, p. 16
Russell, W. M. S. and Burch, R. L. (1959). Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, Methuen, London
Salt, H. S. (1892). Animals’ Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress; reprinted (1980), Society for Animal Rights, Clarks Summit, pp. 98–9
Scott, P. (1981). Speech in a debate at the London School of Economics, 11 March
Shapiro, K. J. (1987). A student’s right to a careful education, Bull. Psychol. Ethical Treatm. Anim., Fall, 9–11
Shuster, S. (1977). Why we need animal research, World Med., 13, 19–37
Singer, P. (1976). Animal Liberation, Jonathan Cape, London; reprinted (1983) Thorsons, Wellingborough
Singer, P. (1979). Practical Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Smith, S. J. and Hendee, W. R. (1988). Animals in research, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 259, 2007–8
Stevens, C. (1984). Mistreatment of lab animals endangers biomedical research, Nature, 311, 295–7
Warnock, M. (1984). Scientific research must have a moral basis, New Sci., 104, 36
Whymant, R. (1983). The butchers of Harbin, Conn. Med., 47, 163–5
Zimmerman, M. (1983). Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals, Pain, 16, 109–10
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Gill Langley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langley, G. (1989). Plea for a Sensitive Science. In: Langley, G. (eds) Animal Experimentation. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20376-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20376-5_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-45383-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20376-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)