Abstract

After Aquinas, the two most notable developments in ethical theory are to be found in the turn from Aristotelian realism to Ockhamist nominalism on the one hand, and the turn towards a prudence-based understanding of right and justice epitomised by Machiavelli on the other hand. In the 13th century, Ockham combined a theory of divine omnipotence with a nominalist metaphysics. The result was an ethical theory which was strongly voluntarist in the sense that ‘goodness is dependent on obligation, obligation on volition, and volition unbound by reason or anything else’. (James Walsh, ‘Nominalism and the Ethics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, January 1966, vol. IV, no. 1, p. 2.) Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) made much of Ockhamist nominalism in his own ethical writings. And Hobbes was also influenced by the 14th century pragmatic political philosophy, in which Machiavelli, most importantly, had argued that rights and civic virtue were circumscribed by such practical considerations as the fact that a ruler must remain in power in order to accomplish anything at all. These pragmatic and nominalist departures from Aquinas reached their most forceful articulation in Hobbes’ writings.

Keywords

Assure Defend Stake Timothy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Works by Hobbes Cited

  1. 1.
    The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury,collected and edited by Sir William Molesworth (London: John Bohn, 1840; second reprint, Germany: Scientia Verlag, 1966) 11 volumes (cited as EW).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Homine, translated by Charles T. Wood, T. S. K. Scott-Craig, and Bernard Gert, in Man and Citizen, edited by Bernard Gert (New York: Anchor Books, 1972 ).Google Scholar

Other Works Cited And/Or Recommended

  1. 1.
    Baier, Annette, ‘Secular Faith’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy vol. 10, 1980, no. 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barry, Brian, ‘Warrender and His Critics’, reprinted in Hobbes and Rousseau, edited by Maurice Cranston and R. S. Peters ( Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Co., 1968 ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodin, Jean, The Six Bookes of a Cornmonwealle (a facsimile reprint of the English translation of 1606), editor K. D. McRae ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1962 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowle, John, Hobbes and His Critics: A Study of Seventeenth Century Constitutionalism ( New York: Barnes and Noble, 1951 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Copp, David, ‘Hobbes on Artificial Persons’, The Philosophical Review vol. 89, October 1980, no. 4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dold, G. W. F., Stipulations for a Third Party ( London: Stevens & Sons, 1948 ).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eachard, John, Mr. Hobbs’s State of Nature Considered: In a Dialogue between Philautus and Timothy, edited by Peter Ure (Liverpool: The English Reprint Series of Liverpool University Press (1672) 1958 ).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gauthier, David, The Logic of Leviathan ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969 ).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gauthier, David, ‘Three Against Justice: The Foole, The Sensible Knave and the Lydian Shepherd’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. V II, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gierke, Otto von, The Development of Political Theory, translated by Bernard Freyd ( New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1939 ).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldsmith, M. M., Hobbes’s Science of Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1966 ).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gough, J. W., The Social Contract (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed., 1957 ).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hampton, Jean, Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition (Cambridge University Press, 1986 ).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holmes, Oliver Wendell. The Common Law, edited by Mark DeWolfe Howe ( Boston: Little Brown, 1963 ).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hood, F. C., The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes (Oxford University Press, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hooker, Richard, The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, edited by R. A. Houk ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1931 ).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kavka, Gregory, Hobbesian Political and Moral Theory (Princeton University Press, 1986 ).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Locke, John, Two Treatises on Government, edited by Peter Laslett (Cambridge University Press, 1967 ).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    MacPherson, C. B., The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Oxford: 1962 ).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    May, Larry, ‘Hobbes’s Contract Theory’, Journal of the History of Philosophy vol. 18, April 1980, no. 2.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    May, Larry, ‘Hobbes on Equity and Justice’, in Hobbes’s Science of Natural Justice, edited by Craig Walton and Paul Johnson (Dordrecht and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987 ).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mintz, Samuel I., The Hunting of Leviathan: Seventeenth-Century Reactions to the Materialism and Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes (Cambridge University Press, 1962 ).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oakeshott, Michael, Hobbes on Civil Association ( Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975 ).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pollock, Sir Frederick, and Frederick William Maitland, The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1909) 2 vols.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Skinner, Quentin, ‘Hobbes on Sovereignty: An Unknown Discussion’, Political Studies, vol. 13, June 1965.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taylor, A. E., Thomas Hobbes (London: Archibold Constable & Co., 1908 ) (facsimile reprint, New York: Kennikat Press, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Warrender, Howard, The Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation ( Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1957 ).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watkins, J. W. N., Hobbes’s System of Ideas ( London: Hutchinson & Co., 1965 ).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wolin, Sheldon, Hobbes and the Epic Tradition of Political Theory ( Los Angeles: William A. Clark Memorial Library, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yale, D. E. C., ‘Hobbes and Hale on Law, Legislation and the Sovereign’, Cambridge Law Journal vol. 31, April 1972, no. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Larry May 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry May

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations