Trade Unions and Political Parties

  • Andrew J. Taylor
Chapter

Abstract

The party-union relationship sprang from the political weakness of unions. As unions were outside the established power structure it was unlikely they would find allies amongst the established parties, though there were exceptions such as the alliance of some British unions with the Liberal Party in the late nineteenth century. As outsider groups they were drawn to outsider parties who made union concerns central to their appeal and who tended to be socialist. The link between unions and socialism (or in the case of American unions, with state intervention) was a reflection of the wish to restructure political and economic power in favour of outsider interests. In parliamentary democracies ‘socialism’ meant reformism not revolution, unions supported particular parties so as to influence them in government and secure concessions. Outsider parties welcomed union support, seeing in the unions a valuable source of finance, votes and organisation to support their electoral take-off. So the relationship was seen as mutually beneficial to two outsider groups striving for access to the political process.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    O Kirchheimer, ‘The Transformation of the West European Party Systems’, in J. La Palombara and M. Weiner (eds), Political Parties and Political Development (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1966) pp. 184–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Freitag (DGB Chairman 1952–5), quoted by R.J. Willey, ‘Trade Unions and Political Parties in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38(8) (February 1974) p. 42, my emphasis.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Schuster, DGB. The German Trade Union Movement (Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 1985) p. 206.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.S. Markovitz, The Politics of West German Trade Unions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986) p. 24.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Unions and the Party (Stockholm: LO, 1985) p. 9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Korpi, The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980) p. 83.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Unions and the Party, p. 8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Swedish Trade Union Confederation (Stockholm: LO, 1981) p. 8, and L. Forseback, Industrial Relations and Employment in Sweden (Stockholm: The Swedish Institute, 1981) p. 105.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Goran-Myrdal, ‘The Swedish Model — Will It Survive?’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(1) (1980) pp. 57–69,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. and his ‘Collective Wage Earner Funds. A Road to Socialism and the end of Freedom of Association’, International Labor Review 120(3) (May–June 1981) pp. 319–33.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Welcome To The Labour Party (London: Labour Party, n.d.) p. 1.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    For an account of the rise and fall of the Liaison Committee, see A.J. Taylor, The Trade Unions and the Labour Party (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Taylor, The Trade Unions, pp. 124–32 for TULV and pp. 220–5 for TUCC. For TUFL, see NEC Report, 1986, p. 3, and ‘Unions Aid Target Seats’, Labour Party News, 1 (February–March 1987) p.11.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    H.M. Drucker, Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour Party (London: Allen & Unwin, 1979),Google Scholar
  15. and his ‘The Influence of the trade unions on the ethos of the Labour Party’, in B. Pimlott and C. Cook (eds), Trade Unions in British Politics (London: Longmans, 1982) pp. 258–71.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    R.F. Hoxie, Trade Unions in the United States (New York: Appleton Press, 1920) pp. 45–6.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Interview with George Meany, U.S. News and World Report, 21 (February 1972) p. 31.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    B. Keller, ‘Organized Labor’s Vital Signs Show Waning Political Clout; But Numbers Don’t Tell All’, Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 40(35) (28 August 1982) p. 2112.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    These figures are calculated from ‘1985 Report on Congress’, AFL-CIO News, 31(7) (15 February 1986).Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    G.K. Wilson, Unions in American National Politics (London: Macmillan, 1979) p. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 19.
    N. Ike, Japanese Politics. Patron-Client Democracy 2nd ed. (New York: A. Knopf, 1972) p. 53.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    R.A. Scalapino, ‘Japanese Socialism in Crisis’, Foreign Affairs, 38(2) (1960) pp.318, 320, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    T. Hanami, Labor Relations in Japan Today (Tokyo, New York and San Francisco: Kodansha International Ltd, 1981) p. 111, andGoogle Scholar
  24. J.A. Stockwin, Japan: Divided Politics in a Growth Economy 2nd edn (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1982) pp. 163–95.Google Scholar
  25. 22.
    Hanami, Labor Relations in Japan Today, pp. 108–10.Google Scholar
  26. 23.
    A. Pelinka, Social Democratic Parties in Europe (New York: Praeger, 1983) p. 129.Google Scholar
  27. 24.
    H. Kastendiek, et al., ‘Institutional Strategies for Trade Union Participation’, in O. Jacobi et al. (eds), Economic Crisis, Trade Unions and The State (London: Croom Helm, 1986) p. 279.Google Scholar
  28. 25.
    G. Braunthal, ‘The Social Democratic Party’, in H.G. Peter Wallach and G.K. Romoser (eds), West German Politics in the Mid-Eighties (New York: Praeger, 1983) pp. 87–8.Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    M. Linton, The Swedish Road To Socialism (London: Fabian Society, 1985) pp. 24–5.Google Scholar
  30. 27.
    The Unions and the Party — A Team (Stockholm: LO, 1984), p. 2.Google Scholar
  31. 28.
    ‘Walfardstaten’ does not have the broadly negative association it has in Anglo-American political culture. Swedish welfare statism is better expressed as ‘communal prosperity’. J.D. Stephens, The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism (London: Macmillan, 1979) pp. 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 29.
    Stephens, The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism, pp. 177–94,Google Scholar
  33. S. Hadenius, Swedish Politics During the Twentieth Century (Stockholm: The Swedish Institute, 1985) p. 165, andGoogle Scholar
  34. M. Donald-Hancock, Sweden. The Politics of Post Industrial Change (New York: Praeger, 1972) Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  35. 30.
    L. Minkin, The Labour Party Conference (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  36. 31.
    Taylor, The Trade Unions, pp. 132–42.Google Scholar
  37. 32.
    Industrial Relations Legislation (London: TUC, 1986), Britain Will Win. Labour Manifesto 1987, pp. 13–4, and TUC-Labour Party Liaison Committee, Work To Win (London: TUC-Labour Party, 1987) pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    Alan Fisher (then NUPE General Secretary), Labour Party Conference Report 1981, p. 220.Google Scholar
  39. 34.
    L. Panitch, ‘Ideology and Integration: The Case of the British Labour Party’, Political Studies, 19 (1971).Google Scholar
  40. 35.
    R. Maidment and A. MacGrew, The American Political Process (London: Sage, 1987) p. 91.Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    J. Cottin and C. Culhane, ‘Committee on Political Education’, in J.G. Smith (ed.), Political Brokers (New York: Liverright National, 1972), and Wilson, Unions in American National Politics, Chapter 2 for COPE’s development.Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    AFL-CIO’s News Release, Annual Carlson Lecture delivered by Lane Kirkland at the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Unions and the American Future, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (18 November 1983) p. 4.Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    D. Bonafede, ‘Labor’s Clout’, National Journal, 15(11) (12 March 1983) p. 569,Google Scholar
  44. R. Gurwitt, ‘Unions Plan Expanded Efforts to Gain More Political Clout and Elect a President in 1984’, Congressional Quarterly Weekly Reports, 14(38) (24 September 1983) p. 1918, andGoogle Scholar
  45. D.R. Sweitzer (Democratic National Committee, Director of Finance) to author, 27 May 1987, my emphasis.Google Scholar
  46. 39.
    Sohyo News, 360 (15 July 1980) pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  47. 40.
    Sohyo News, 361 (15 September 1980) p. 11.Google Scholar
  48. 41.
    Sohyo News, 372 (15 August 1982) pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  49. 42.
    ‘Sohyo’s Movement Policy’ (12 July 1983), Sohyo News, 377 (15 September 1983) pp. 41–2, and 380 (15 July 1984) pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  50. 43.
    Sohyo News, 377 (15 September 1983) p. 8.Google Scholar
  51. 44.
    Sohyo News, 377 (15 September 1983) p. 9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew Taylor 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Taylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations