Advertisement

Political Natality: The Rebirth of Beginning

  • Patricia Bowen-Moore

Abstract

The category of natality includes a preliminary manifestation at birth — the première of a new creation and the capacity for beginning which is announced by the birth of a child. The coincidence of the beginner and a beginning is the meaning we assigned to primary natality; its factual content was given by the experiences of play and education by which the beginner experimented with the faculty for novelty as the capacity to commence projects and to insert unique interpretations in the world of the nursery. These nursery experiences of play and education were shown to be activities of a pre-political kind inasmuch as through them children were introduced to and prepared for the world of adulthood rather than the world of politics. Politics, to be sure, is not like the nursery and this for the most obvious of reasons: children are peers only to other children; they are still under the guidance of adult authority; the principle of political equality does not govern their relationships; the world of childhood is essentially private and self- contained; childhood interests and activities are not usually inspired by a comprehensive love and reverence for the world of human affairs. Politics is not like the nursery because in politics the principles of equality, distinctness and the attitude of amor mundi reign supreme and become the possibilities for those adults who partake of the political in a mature and responsible manner.

Keywords

Political Actor Political Life Political Reality Human Affair Political Freedom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Reply to Eric Voeglin: The Origins of Totalitarianism’, Review of Politics, 15 (1953), 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elisabeth Young-Bruehl, Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1982), p. 4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ‘Reply’, 78. Arendt tells us that one of the major historical conditions for the rise of totalitarianism was the decline of the nation-state through imperialistic expansion. Nationalism is the term given to the usurpation of the nation over the state through imperialistic interests. By definition, the nation is ‘a closed society to which one belongs by right of birth. The state on the other hand is an open society... [which] knows only citizens no matter what nationality; its legal order is open to all who happen to live on its territory.’ When nationalism displaces the state by dint of imperialistic expansion it establishes itself as the supreme legal and moral authority. Arendt discovers in the experiences of anti-Semitism and imperialism the phenomenon of total domination made possible by reducing classes of human beings to mere human superfluity. In Nazi Germany, the specific target for its ruthless political domination was the Jews viewed as an unfit class. [Arendt, ‘The Nation’, The Review of Politics, Vol. 8 (1946) 139].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Social Science Techniques and the Study of the Concentration Camps.’ Jewish Social Studies, 12 (1950) 61.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1973).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., p. 464.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid., p. 465.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arendt,’ social Science’, 60.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibid., 60–1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arendt, ‘Reply’, 83.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Approaches to the “German Problem”’, Partisan Review, 12 n1 (Winter, 1945), 95.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, p. 458.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibid., p. 466.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ibid., p. 443.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibid., p. 443.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid., pp. 478–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1958), pp. 176–7.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ibid., p. 24.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘What is Authority?’, Between Past and Future (New York: The Viking Press, 1968), p. 119.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Public Rights and Private Interest’, Small Comforts for Hard Times, ed. M. Mooney and F. Stubert (New York: Columbia University, 1977), p. 103.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arendt’s The Human Condition, p. 52.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., p. 52.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ibid., p. 52.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibid., p. 199.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ibid., p. 57.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Introduction to Politics’, Chicago (Autumn course, 1963). ‘The world insofar as it is political has two characteristics: it is public, as opposed to things that are hidden and it is common, as opposed to things we own in private. As to public: It exists in the light of publicity, everything is seen or heard. Appearance — seen and heard by others is what makes reality.’ (023804)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arendt, The Human Condition, p. 41. ‘But the background of actual political experience, at least in Plato and Aristotle, remained so strong that the distinction between the spheres of household and political life was never doubted. Without mastering the necessities of life in the household, neither life nor the “good life” is possible, but politics is never for the sake of life. As far as the members of the polis are concerned, household life exists for the sake of the “good life” in the polis.’ (p. 37).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid., p. 49.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid., p. 215.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid., p. 184.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibid., p. 19.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ibid., p. 200.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ibid., p. 200. Arendt underscores the dynamic reality of power by referring to its etymological basis: The word itself, its Greek equivalent dynamis, like the Latin potentia... indicate its “potential” character.’Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘On Violence’, Crises of the Republic (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972), p. 143.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ibid., p. 238.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hannah Arendt, The Life of the Mind: Thinking (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1977, 1978), p. 74.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Arendt, ‘On Violence’, Crises of the Republic, p. 179.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ibid., p. 179.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Introduction to Politics’, 023803.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ibid., 023803.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Arendt, ‘On Violence’, Crises of the Republic, p. 177.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Arendt, ‘Civil Disobedience’, Crises of the Republic, p. 92.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Arendt, The Life of the Mind: Willing, p. 2.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arendt, ‘What is Freedom?’, Between Past and Future, p. 145.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Arendt, The Human Condition, p. 9.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Arendt, ‘What is Freedom?’, Between Past and Future, p. 149.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Concern with Politics in Recent European Philosophical Thought’, an unpublished lecture (1954). Manuscript Division: Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., 023253.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Arendt, ‘What is Freedom?’, Between Past and Future, p. 146.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ibid., p. 148.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ibid., p. 148.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Understanding and Politics’, Partisan Review 20 (1953), 390.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Karl Jaspers: Citizen of the World?’, Men in Dark Times (New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich, Inc., 1968), p. 82.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Arendt, The Human Condition, p. 233.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ibid., p. 220.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ibid., p. 233.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ibid., p. 231.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ibid., p. 230.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ibid., p. 244.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ibid., p. 244.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (New York: The Viking Press, 1965), p. 175.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Arendt, ‘Civil Disobedience’, Crises of the Republic, p. 93.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Arendt, The Human Condition, p. 237.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ibid., p. 237.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ibid., p. 241.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Arendt, ‘Bertholt Brecht: 18981956’, Men In Dark Times, p. 248.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Arendt, The Human Condition, p. 237.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ibid., p. 236.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ibid., p. 181.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ibid., pp. 180–1.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ibid., pp. 184, 187.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ibid., p. 179.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ibid., p. 192.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ibid., p. 184.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Arendt, ‘What is Freedom?’, Between Past and Future, p. 171.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ibid., p. 170.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ibid., p. 170.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Arendt, ‘The Concept of History: Ancient and Modern’, Between Past and Future, p. 84.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘The Cold War and the West’, Partisan Review, 29 (Winter, 1962), 15.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Totalitarian Imperialism: Reflections on The Hungarian Revolution’, The Journal of Politics, 20 (1958) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hannah Arendt, ‘Home to Roost’, The American Experiment: Perspectives on 200 Years, ed. Sam B. Warner (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976), p. 75.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (New York: The Viking Press, 1965), pp. 28–9.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Arendt, On Revolution, p. 34.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Arendt, On Revolution, pp. 41, 44. So disinclined were they for novelty that we are advised by Arendt to regard them, initially, as anything but revolutionary: ‘Psychologically speaking, the experience of foundation combined with the conviction that a new story is about to unfold in history will make men “conservative” rather than “revolutionary”, eager to preserve what has been done to assure its stability rather than open for new things, new developments, new ideas.’ (p. 41)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Arendt, On Revolution, pp. 46–7.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Arendt, ‘Hungarian Revolution’, p. 24.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Arendt, ‘Hungarian Revolution’, p. 26. ‘An unarmed and essentially harmless student demonstration grew from a few thousand suddenly and spontaneously into a huge crowd which took it upon itself to carry out one of the students’ demands, the overturning of Stalin’s statue in one of the public squares in Budapest. The following day, some students went to the Radio Building to persuade the station to broadcast the sixteen points of their manifesto. A large crowd immediately gathered, as if from nowhere, and when the AVH, the police guarding the building, tried to disperse the crowd with a few shots, the revolution broke out. The masses attacked the police and acquired their first weapons. The workers, hearing of the situation, left the factories and joined the crowd. The army, called to defend the regime and help the armed police, sided with the revolution and armed the people. What had started as a student demonstration had become an armed uprising in less than 24 hours.’Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ibid., p. 26.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ibid., p. 33.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ibid., p. 33.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ibid., p. 5. In The Human Condition, Arendt states: ‘If the tragedy of the Hungarian revolution achieved nothing more than that it showed the world that, all defeats and all appearances notwithstanding, this political élan has not yet died, its sacrifices were not in vain.’ (p. 217).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ibid., p. 31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Patricia Bowen-Moore 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Bowen-Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Nazareth College of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations