This paper is divided into four parts. In Section 1 some meanings of the term ‘market’ are discussed, with special emphasis on the sociocultural meaning of market, namely on the market cultural attitude that results from self-interest as it is perceived and operates in certain specific cultural contexts. We are then led, in Section 2, to an analysis of the role of institutions in shaping the economic system and in assuring its structural stability. This is followed by a consideration of the shortcomings of some of the approaches by which economists analyse the strategies of firms that have to take into account, not only the behaviour of their rivals, but also that of government, parliament and social groups. In Section 3 we examine how the market affects the working of institutions, more specifically of the political system. We show that it is not possible to partition the social system into economic and institutional-political systems. In Section 4 we face some theoretical problems concerning the link between market and institutions and try to visualise the conditions for a workable state with efficiency and justice.


Economic System Political System Entrepreneurial Activity Market Mechanism Market Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arrow, K. J. and Hahn, F. H. (1971) General Competitive Analysis (San Francisco: Holden-Day).Google Scholar
  2. Benassy, J. P. (1977) ‘On Quantity Signals and the Foundations of Effective Demand Theory’, in Strom, S. and Werin, L. (eds) Topics in Disequilibrium Economics (London: Macmillan Press).Google Scholar
  3. Bohannan, P. and Dalton, G. (1962) Markets in Africa (Chicago: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, D. (1959) Monopoly in Economics and Law, 2nd edn, 1964 (Chicago: Rand McNally).Google Scholar
  6. Diamond, P. A. (1984) A Search-Equilibrium Approach to the Micro Foundations of Macroeconomics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  7. Hahn, F. H. (1977) ‘Exercises in Conjectural Equilibria’, in Strom, S. and Werin, L. (eds) Topics in Disequilibrium Economics (London: Macmillan Press).Google Scholar
  8. Harsanyi, J. C. (1955) ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy, 63.Google Scholar
  9. Hurwicz, L. (1971) ‘Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Processes’, in Eckstein, A. (ed.) Comparison of Economic Systems (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  10. Lindblom, C. (1977) Politics and Markets. The World’s Political-Economic Systems (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  11. Lombardini, S. (1954) Fondamenti e Problemi dell’ Economia del Benessere (Milano: Giuffrè).Google Scholar
  12. Lombardini, S. (1957) L’analisi della Domanda nella teoria Economica (Milano: Giuffrè).Google Scholar
  13. Lombardini, S. (1983) ‘Democrazia e mercato’, in Lombardini, S., Il Metodo della Scienza Economica’ (Torino: Utet).Google Scholar
  14. Lombardini, S. (1985) ‘At the Roots of the Crisis of Economic Theory’, Economia Internazionale. Google Scholar
  15. Lombardini, S. (1986) ‘Economia e Societa nell’Unione Sovietica’, Rivista Milanese di Economia, 18.Google Scholar
  16. Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. (1957) Gaines and Decisions, Introduction and Critical Survey (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
  17. Malinvaud, E. (1977) The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered (Oxford: Basil Black well).Google Scholar
  18. Marschak, J. (1950) ‘Rational Behaviour, Uncertain Prospects and Measurable Utility’, Econometrica. Google Scholar
  19. McLennen, E. F. (1978) ‘The Minimax Theory and Expected-utility Reasoning’, in Hooker, C. A., Leach, J. J. and McLennen, E. F. (eds) Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, vol. 1 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).Google Scholar
  20. Meade, J. (1971) The Controlled Economy (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  21. Minsky, H. P. (1975) John Maynard Keynes (London, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press).Google Scholar
  22. Mueller, D. C. (1979) Public Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  23. Negishi, Y. (1968) ‘Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies. Google Scholar
  24. Neumann, J. von and Morgenstern, O. (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  25. Offe, C. (1980) ‘The Separation of Form and Content in Liberal Democratic Polities’, Studies in Political Economy. Google Scholar
  26. Okun, A. M. (1975) Equality and Efficiency (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
  27. Olson, M. (1968) The Logic of Collective Action (New York: Schocken Books).Google Scholar
  28. Pareto, V. (1916) Trattato di Sociologia Generate, vols 1, 2 (Milano: Edizioni di Comunita, 1964).Google Scholar
  29. Parsons, T. (1940) ‘The Motivation of Economic Activity’, Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science, no. 6.Google Scholar
  30. Pasinetti, L. L. (1981) Structural Change and Economic Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  31. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1979) La Nouvelle Alliance, Métamorphose de la Science (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
  32. Rawls, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  33. Schotter, A. (1981) The Economic Theory of Social Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schumpeter, J. A. (1912) The Theory of Economic Development (Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot) Translated R. Opie (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1934) Reprinted (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
  35. Schwartz, T. (1986) The Logic of Collective Choice (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  36. Shubik, M. (1959) Strategy and Market Structure: Competition, Oligopoly and the Theory of Games (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
  37. Smith, Adam (1776) The Wealth of Nations 1961 edn (Cannan, E.)Google Scholar
  38. Spencer, H. (1867) A System of Synthetic Philosophy, First Principles (Thinker’s Library Edition).Google Scholar
  39. Stocking, G. W. (1964) ‘The Effectiveness of the Antitrust Laws’, in Mansfield, E. (ed.) Monopoly Power and Economic Performance (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
  40. Tonnies, F. (1955) Community and Association (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  41. Wiener, N. (1964) God and Golem, Inc. (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
  42. Hurwicz, L. (1973) ‘The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation’, American Economic Review Proceeding, vol. 63, May, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  43. Kirzner, I. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  44. Lewis, D. (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  45. Plott, C. and Smith, V. (1978) ‘An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 45, February, pp. 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reiter, S. (1977) ‘Information and Performance in the (New)2 Welfare Economies’, American Economic Review Proceedings, vol. 67, February, pp. 226–34.Google Scholar
  47. Schotter, A. (1981) The Economic Theory of Social Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sen, A. (1979) ‘The Welfare Basis of Real Incomes Comparisons: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 17, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, V. (1976) ‘Bidding and Auctioning Institutions: Experimental Results’, in Amihudo, Y. (ed.) Bidding and Auctioning for Procurement and Allocation (New York: New York University Press).Google Scholar
  50. Ullman-Margalit, E. (1978) The Emergence of Norms (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  51. Dosi, G. and Egidi, M. (1987) ‘Substantive and Procedural Uncertainty: An Exploration of Economic Behaviours in Complex and Changing Environment’, Brighton, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, DRC Discussion Paper, prepared for the Conference on ‘Programmable Automation and New Work Modes’, Paris, 2–4 April 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siro Lombardini
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TurinItaly

Personalised recommendations