The Well-Beloved is and is not Hardy’s last novel. No manuscript exists, but the serial version, The Pursuit of the Well-Beloved, A Sketch of a Temperament1 was printed weekly in The Illustrated London News from 1 October to 17 December 1892. In book form there was published in March 1897 The Well-Beloved, A Sketch of a Temperament,2 a text usually taken as definitive and yet regarded simultaneously as a ‘variant’ of 1892. By this sleight-of-hand a date 1892 is attached to the work and Jude the Obscure (book version 1895) is somewhat confusedly given the status of the last novel that Hardy wrote. The canon then ends with a bang. But the three works are both linked and discrete. The Well-Beloved, though closely linked with The Pursuit, has major differences from it in plot, character and narratorial stance, giving it practical claims to be regarded as the last work of fiction. Theoretical claims I shall turn to later. Jude, while overtly different, shares a common matrix with the other two and is particularly close to The Pursuit. These facts about the texts and their ambiguous chronology encourage the reader to regard them as a trilogy. Such a reading potentiates the understanding of Hardy’s last work as a ‘feminist’ novelist and suggests that he did not abandon novel-writing only because of critical hostility to the immensely successful Jude but because he had so far unravelled the traditional fictional processes of ‘classic realism’3 towards the poetry that he published for the rest of his life.
KeywordsMigration Coherence Assure Hunt Ghost
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.C. Belsey, ‘Constructing the Subject: Deconstructing the Text’, in J. Newton and D. Rosenfelt (eds), Feminist Criticism and Social Change, (New York: Methuen, 1985), pp. 45ff.Google Scholar
- 4.H. Orel, Thomas Hardy’s Personal Writings (London: Macmillan, 1967), p. 4.Google Scholar
- 9.F. E. Hardy, The Later Years of Thomas Hardy, 1892–1928 (London: Macmillan, 1930), p. 90.Google Scholar
- 19.J. Goode, ‘Sue Bridehead and the New Woman’, in Mary Jacobus (ed.), Women Writing and Writing about Women (London: Helen Croom; New York: Barnes & Noble, 1979), pp. 100–13: pp. 103–5.Google Scholar
- 21.R. L. Purdy and M. Millgate (eds), The Collected Letters of Thomas Hardy, (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1978-).Google Scholar
- 25.J. Hillis Miller, Fiction and Repetition (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982), pp. 147–75.Google Scholar
- 27.F. B. Pinion (ed.), Old Mrs. Chundle and Other Stories (London: Macmillan, 1977), p. 117.Google Scholar
- 28.M. Millgate, Thomas Hardy, a Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1982).Google Scholar
- 30.G. Beer, Darwin’s Plots (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983), pp. 239–40.Google Scholar
- 33.K. Rogers, ‘Women in Thomas Hardy’, Centennial Review, vol. 19 (1975) no. 4, pp. 249–58: p. 257.Google Scholar
- 34.J. B. Wittenberg, ‘Thomas Hardy’s First Novel: Women and the Quest for Autonomy’, Colby Library Quarterly, vol. 18 (1982) no. 1, pp. 47–54: p. 54.Google Scholar
- 35.For example, P. Boumelha, Thomas Hardy and Women: Sexual Ideology and Narrative Form (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1982).Google Scholar