The term domestic labour entered economic vocabulary in the early 1970s as a result of feminist interest in criticizing and expanding economic categories to incorporate women’s activities. Both mainstream and critical traditions in economics tried to grapple with the problem of how to account for the difference between men’s and women’s position on the labour market. One approach was to relate women’s lesser training and skills in paid employment to competing demands made on (married) woman’s time by domestic commitments, with a tacit, though unexplained, acceptance that for women paid employment has to fit into time left over after the allocation of that needed for domestic labour, while for men it is the other way round. It is only by the addition of such an assumption that the analysis of domestic labour can be said to have had anything to say about women.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arrow, K.J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Commission Monograph No. 12, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Dalla Costa, M. 1973. Women and the subversion of the community. In The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. 2nd edn, Bristol: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
- Deiphy, C. 1970. The main enemy. Partisans (Paris), Nos. 54–55.Google Scholar
- Gardiner, J., Himmelweit, S. and Macintosh, M. 1975. Women’s domestic labour. Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists 4(2). Reprinted in On the Political Economy of Women, CSE Pamphlet No. 2, London: Stage One, 1976.Google Scholar
- Harrison, J. 1973. The political economy of housework. Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists 3(1), Winter, 35–52.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, M. 1981. The Politics of Reproduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Seccombe, W. 1975. Domestic labour — reply to critics. New Left Review 94, November/ December, 85–96.Google Scholar