General Equilibrium pp 98-107 | Cite as

# Conjectural Equilibria

## Abstract

In an economy with very many agents the market environment of any one of these is independent of the market actions he decides upon. More generally one can characterize an economy as *perfectly competitive* if the removal of any one agent from the economy would leave the remaining agents just as well off as they were before his removal. (The economy is said to satisfy a ‘no surplus’ condition; see Makowski, 1980; and Ostroy, 1980.) When an economy is not perfectly competitive, an agent in making a decision must take note of its effect on his market environment, for example, the price at which he can sell. This effect may not be known (or known with certainty) and will therefore be the subject of *conjecture*. A conjecture differs from expectations concerning future market environments which may, say, be generated by some stochastic process. It is concerned with responses to the actions of the agent.

## Keywords

General Equilibrium Competitive Equilibrium Supply Function Market Environment Sequential Equilibrium## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Bibliography

- Arrow, K.J. 1959. Toward a theory of price adjustment. In M. Abramovitz et al.,
*The Allocation of Economic Resources*, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 41–51.Google Scholar - Bresnahan, T.F 1981. Duopoly models with consistent conjectures.
*American Economic Review*71(5), 934–45.Google Scholar - Drèze, J. 1975. Existence of equilibrium under price rigidity and quantity rationing.
*International Economic Review*16, 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gabszewicz, J.J. and Vial, J.D. 1972. Oligopoly ‘à la Cournot’ in general equilibrium analysis.
*Journal of Economy Theory*4, 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gale, D. 1978. A note on conjectural equilibria.
*Review of Economic Studies*45(1), 33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hahn, F.H. 1977. Exercise in conjectural equilibria.
*Scandinavian Journal of Economics*79, 210–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hahn, F.H. 1978. On non-Walrasian equilibria.
*Review of Economic Studies*45, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hart, O. 1982. Reasonable conjectures. Suntory Toyota Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines. London School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Kreps, D.M. and Wilson, R.B. 1982. Sequential equilibria.
*Econometrica*50, 863–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Makowski, L. 1980. A characterization of perfectly competitive economies with production.
*Journal of Economic Theory*22(2), 208–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Makowski, L. 1983. ‘Rational conjectures’ aren’t rational and ‘reasonable conjectures’ aren’t reasonable. SSRC Project on Risk, Information and Quantity Signals. Cambridge University Discussion Paper 60.Google Scholar
- Negishi, T. 1960. Monopolistic competition and general equilibrium.
*Review of Economic Studies*28, 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Negishi, T. 1979.
*Micro-Economic Foundations of Keynesian Macro-Economics*. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar - Novshek, W. and Sonnenschein, H. 1978. Cournot and Walras equilibrium.
*Journal of Economic Theory*19, 223–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ostroy, J. 1980. The no-surplus condition as a characterisation of perfectly competitive equilibrium.
*Journal of Economic Theory*22(2), 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Silvestre, J. 1977. A model of a general equilibrium with monopolistic behaviour.
*Journal of Economic Theory*16(2), 425–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Triffin, R. 1940.
*Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium Theory*. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Ulph, D. 1983. Rational conjectures in the theory of oligopoly.
*International Journal of Industrial Organization*1(2), 131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar