Abstract
Each of these three chapters deals with the inadequacies of measures of recorded unemployment. Taylor implicitly, and de Neubourg explicitly, suggest that we require a finer breakdown of unemployment data into categories which are useful for policy information. Any tool will be rough and ready and we are sure to be disappointed if we seek perfect idealised theoretical categories, empirically operational categories and politically useful categories of any economic variable. What needs to be demonstrated is that current methods can be improved upon and that these alternatives prove useful to some degree, for theoretical, empirical and policy analysis. Both Taylor and de Neubourg make much of the shortcomings of U-V analysis but it is not easy to suggest an alternative. Neither writer seems to feel that input-output techniques may prove useful here.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsEditor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Joan Muysken and Chris de Neubourg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heathfield, D. (1989). Comment on Chapters 5, 6 and 7. In: Muysken, J., de Neubourg, C. (eds) Unemployment in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19795-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19795-8_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19797-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19795-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)