Skip to main content
  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

Early modern minds, fascinated by supposedly significant ‘correspondences’, constantly drew parallels between political and domestic institutions: the macrocosm of state, church and city resembling the microcosm of the family. The family or household (the terms were virtually synonymous) was ‘a small commonwealth’, ‘a little church’. What was meant was more than a telling analogy. It was believed, for example by the mid-Tudor statesman Sir Thomas Smith, that complex social and political structures had their origins in the family, which contained ‘the first and most natural beginning and source of cities, towns, nations, kingdoms and of all civil societies’.1 The Fifth (in catholic arithmetic Fourth) Commandment, ‘Honour thy father and thy mother’, was universally construed to extend far beyond its immediate frame of reference to define the ground of all social and political being, articulating what the title of a Jacobean book called The doctrine of superioritie and of subiection (Robert Prick, 1609). This was no fantasy. In an age of personal and dynastic monarchy, politics really was a family affair. How else to explain the Italian Wars or the War of the Spanish Succession? Or, for that matter, King Lear?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. References here are to the current research of Diana O’Hara of the University of Kent; Hanawalt, The Ties that Bound; and J. A. Sharpe, ‘Plebeian Marriage in Stuart England: Some Evidence from Popular Literature’, in Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, XXXVI (1986) 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas Fuller (ed.), The Works of Henry Smith, I (Edinburgh, 1866) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miranda Chaytor, ‘Household and Kinship: Ryton in the Late 16th and Early 17th Centuries’, in History Workshop, 10 (1980) 25–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. For Mary Honeywood and Dering’s relations with her see Thomas Fuller, The History of the Worthies of England (1662) II, pp. 85–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael Macdonald, Mystical Bedlam (Cambridge, 1981) pp. 217-31; Jasper Heartwell, Trodden Down Strength (1647). On the Drake case see G. H. Williams in Harvard Library Bulletin XVI (1968) 111–28

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. John Somerville, ‘English Puritans and Children: A Social-Cultural Explanation’, in Journal of Psycho-History, VI (1978–9) 113–37

    Google Scholar 

  7. Margo Todd, ‘Humanists, Puritans and the Spiritualized Household’, in Church History, XLIX (1980) 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Patrick Collinson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collinson, P. (1988). The Protestant Family. In: The Birthpangs of Protestant England. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19584-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19584-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19586-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19584-8

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics