Abstract
The Idiot caused Dostoevsky more trouble than his other major novels. He wrote some seven drafts, which differ wildly in their plottings, and feared, after finishing, that he had expressed only a fraction of what he intended. The notoriously hard task he set himself was to depict a good man, and the question of success, in Dostoevsky’s mind, was linked to the question of the comic. Both Don Quixote and Dickens’s Mr Pickwick haunted the composition, and he noted that these figures are good only because they are ridiculous at the same time. Despite his fears, he did produce that ‘pity aroused for the Good which is mocked and does not know its own value’ (Letters, January 1868). Like all his great books, The Idiot is a flawed masterpiece, the best scenes of which have an unforgettable immediacy unavailable to more ‘perfect’ stylists. And the reader’s sympathy, as in any good novel, is divided and mobilised on behalf of a number of characters.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1988 Peter Conradi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conradi, P. (1988). The Idiot (1868). In: Fyodor Dostoevsky. Modern Novelists. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19551-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19551-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-40763-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19551-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)