Citizens’ Initiatives: Grassroots Democracy and the Growth of Environmentalism in the 1970s and 1980s

  • Rob Burns
  • Wilfried van der Will

Abstract

The beginnings of the 1970s marked a distinct hiatus in the history of the West German protest movements: the APO was to all intents and purposes defunct and the student movement ebbing, the peace movement seemed in abeyance as a campaigning force, and the women’s movement was as yet barely more than a dot on the political horizon. Also, the installation of an SPD/FDP coalition government committed to détente abroad and social reform at home no doubt nourished the hope that parliament might show itself more receptive to the aspirations and concerns of all individuals and groups whose protesting voices had hitherto been dismissed by those in power. And yet, for all that, the early 1970s was a period of intense extra-parliamentary activity, for it witnessed the growth — unparalleled in Europe either at the time or since — of what came to be known as Bürgerinitiativen (citizens’ initiatives). This was the term applied to ‘spontaneous, loosely organised association of citizens, normally in existence for a limited period of time only, who, directly affected by a specific issue, intercede outside the traditional institutions and participatory forms of representative party democracy and who seek, either by way of self-help or by way of influencing public opinion and exercising political pressure, to prompt action on the part of the authorities with regard to the citizens’ particular concern’.1

Keywords

Clay Welding Manifold Rubber Uranium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    B. Guggenberger, Bürgerinitiativen in der Parteiendemokratie (Stuttgart/Berlin/Cologne/Mainz, 1980) pp. 18/9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Sontheimer, ‘Bürgerinitiativen — Versuch einer Begriffsbestimmung’, in Bürgerinitiativen und repräsentatives System, ed. B. Guggenberger and U. Kempf (Opladen, 2nd edn 1984) p.97.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Negt, Politik als Protest (Frankfurt, 1971) p. 174.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cited by R. Roth in ‘Notizen zur politischen Geschichte der Bürgerinitiativen in der Bundesrepublik’, in Parlamentarisches Ritual und politische Alternativen, ed. R. Roth (Frankfurt/New York, 1980) p. 82.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sontheimer, ‘Bürgerinitiativen’ p. 99.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cf. the figures (given by the Umweltbundesamt for 1980) of over five million West German citizens organised in 11 468 regional and national environmentalist groupings (cited in G. Langguth, Protestbewegung, Entwicklung, Niedergang, Renaissance, Die Neue Linke seit 1968 (Cologne, 1983) p. 262).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cf. A. Pelinka, Bürgerinitiativen — gefährlich oder notwendig? (Freiburg/Würzburg, 1978) p. 53.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Offe, Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates (Frankfurt, 1972) pp. 161/2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Haffner, ‘Die neue Sensibilität des Bürgers’, in Guggenberger and Kempf (eds), Bürgerinitiativen und repräsentatives System, p. 93.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    For a summary of the empirical studies on Bürgerinitiativen conducted in the 1970s, see W. Rüdig, ‘Bürgerinitiativen im Umweltschutz. Eine Bestandsaufmahme der empirischen Befunde’, in Bürgerinitiativen in der Gesellschaft, ed. V. Hauff (Villingen-Schwenningen, 1980) pp. 119–84 and U. Kempf, ‘Bürgerinitiativen — Der empirische Befund’, in Guggenberger and Kempf (eds), Bürgerinitiativen und repräsentatives System, pp. 295–317.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Mayer-Tasch, Die Bürgerinitiativenbewegung (Reinbek, 1976) p. 129.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cf. the discussion in Die Bürgerinitiativenbewegung, pp. 145–204.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Figures given in P. von Kodolitsch, ‘Effizienzsteigerung oder Systemüberwindung — zur empirischen Erfolgsbilanz der Bürgerinitiativen’, in Guggenberger and Kempf (eds), Bürgerinitiativen und repräsentatives System, pp. 318 — 32.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    See M. Müller, ‘Bürgerinitiativen in der politischen Willenbildung’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vol. 11 (19 March 1983) p. 37.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Kodolitsch, ‘Effizienzsteigerung oder Systemüberwindung zur empirischen Erfolgsbilanz der Bürgerinitiativen’, p. 318.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The results of the survey are reproduced and analysed in P. von Kodolitsch, ‘Gemeindeverwaltungen und Bürgerinitiativen. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage’, Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften (1975) p. 274.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    See W. Beywl and H. Brombach, ‘Neue Selbstorganisationen. Zwischen kultureller Autonomie und politischer Vereinnahmung’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vol. 11 (17 March 1984) pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    See L. Doormann, ‘Schulreform durch Elterninitiativen?’, Vorgänge, Vol. 16, No. 27 (March 1977) pp. 94–100.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    For detailed accounts of the squats in Frankfurt and West Berlin see, respectively, T. Schultz, ‘Hausbesetzungen im Westend — eine Bürgerinitiative?’, in Bürgerinitiativen. Schritte zur Veränderung!, ed. H. Grossman (Frankfurt, 1972) pp. 138–51 and J. Scheer and J. Espert, Deutschland, Deutschland, alles ist vorbei (Munich, 1982) pp. 22–32. See also Hausbesetzer, ed. S. Aust and S. Rosenbladt (Hamburg, 1981).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Extracts of the report were reproduced in Frankfurter Rundschau, 16 April 1981.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Breit and H. Harms, ‘Hausbesetzungen’, Gegenwartskunde, No. 4 (1981) p. 534.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    The results of the survey were reproduced in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10 July 1981.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quoted in Scheer and Espert, Deutschland, Deutschland, alles ist vorbei p. 26.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cf. K. Dyson, ‘Left-Wing Political Extremism and the Problem of Tolerance in Western Germany’, Government and Opposition, (Summer 1975) pp. 306–31. See also Extremisten und öffentlicher Dienst, ed. E.-W. Böckenförde et al., (Baden-Baden, 1982), a comparative study of twelve European countries which demonstrates that the legal machinery in West Germany has reached a degree of ‘perfection’ not apparent elsewhere.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quoted in Frankfurter Rundschau (31 January 1978).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    W.-D. Narr, ‘Threats to Constitutional Freedom in West Germany’, New German Critique, No. 8 (1976) p. 40.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Glotz, Die Innenausstattung der Macht (Frankfurt, 1981) p. 248.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Quoted in Süddeutsche Zeitung (26 June 1985).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Pallister, ‘Big Brother arrived yesterday’, Guardian, 24 April 1980; cf. the Spiegel publication, Der Weg in den Überwachungsstaat, ed. J Bölsche (Reinbek, 1979).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Münchner Merkur, 6 April 1983.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    International Herald Tribune, 14 April 1983.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Der Spiegel, 18 April 1983.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Friedrich Zimmermann, quoted in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (6 April 1983).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Figures published in Spandauer Volksblatt, 6 Feburary 1982.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    In 1974, for example, 41 per cent of those questioned designated environmental protection as a ‘very important’ topic. In 1977 59 per cent did so and in 1979 the figure was 90 per cent (cf. M. and S. Greiffenhagen, Ein schwieriges Vaterland (Frankfurt, 2nd edn 1981) p. 405).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    E. Papadakis, The Green Movement in West Germany (London/ Canberra, 1984) pp. 30–43; for an historical elaboration of this thesis see U. Linse, Ökopax und Anarchie (Munich, 1984).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cf. R. Inglehart, The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics (Princeton, 1977).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    First coined in Germany by Robert Jungk, the phrase was popularised by Erhard Eppler, initially in his article, ‘Die Qualität des Lebens’, Süddeutsche Zeitung (20 April 1972).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stuttgarter Nachrichten, 29 September 1977; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 26 November 1982.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Forderungskatalog für ein Öko-Konzept in der BRD, ed. BBU (Karlsruhe, 1979), reproduced in Frankfurter Rundschau (4/5 July 1979).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cf. J.M. Leinen, ‘Die Bürgerinitiativen nach der Bundestagswahl’, Die Neue Gesellschaft, Vol. 30, No. 4 (1983) pp. 307–13.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Quoted in Der Spiegel (13 May 1985).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    tageszeitung, 12 April 1984.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Die Zeit, 19 October 1985Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Statistics reproduced in G. Haaf et al., ‘... und weiter sterben die Wälder’, Die Zeit (19 October 1984), pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Umweltbundesamt, Daten zur Umwelt 1984 (Berlin, 1985) reproduced in B. Dost, Ein Land erstickt (Munich, 1985) p. 73.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    The campaign at Wyhl spawned a considerable body of documentary and critical literature. See, for example, H.-H. Wüstenhagen, Bürger gegen Kernkraftwerke (Reinbek, 1975); Lieber heute aktiv als morgen radioaktiv, ed. N. Gladitz (Berlin, 1976); W. Sternstein, Überall ist Wyhl (Frankfurt, 1978); D. Rucht, Von Wyhl nach Gorleben (Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cf. Der Spiegel, 30 December 1985.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    W. Sternstein, ‘Das Beispiel Wyhl’, Vorgänge, Vol. 16, No. 27 (1977) p. 81.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    See G. Trautmann, ‘Defizitärer Planungsstaat und politische Legitimität — Der Fall Brokdorf’, in Guggenberger and Kempf (eds), Bürgerinitiativen und repräsentatives System, (1st edn, 1978), pp. 309–66.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cited in D. Stacker, ‘Brokdorf und die Staatsgewalt’, Vorgänge, Vol. 16, No. 27 (1977) p. 86.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Handelsblatt, 16 February 1977.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cf. the discussion of these polls in Papadakis, The Green Movement in West Germany, p. 69.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    See R. Jungk, Der Atomstaat (Reinbek, 1979).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    See G. Zint, Republik Freies Wendland — Eine Dokumentation (Frankfurt, 1980).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cf. the EMNID poll, published in Der Spiegel (12 May 1986), which found that 69 per cent of those questioned were against the construction of further nuclear power stations.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    K.-W. Brand, D. Büsser and D. Rucht, Aufbruch in eine andere Gesellschaft (Frankfurt, 1984) pp. 92–102.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cf. the various surveys discussed in Guggenberger, Bürgerinitiativen in der Parteiendemokratie, p. 80; Kempf, ‘Bürgerinitiativen — Der empirische Befund’, p. 307; von Kodolitsch, ‘Effizienzsteigerung oder Systemüberwindung. Zur empirischen Erfolgsbilanz der Bürgerinitiativen’, p. 323.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Pelinka, Bürgerinitiativen — gefährlich oder notwendig?, p. 64.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cf. Offe, Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates, p. 163.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    G. Spörl, ‘Protest verhindert wenig, doch verändert vieles’, Die Zeit, 20 April 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rob Burns and Wilfried van der Will 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Burns
    • 1
  • Wilfried van der Will
    • 2
  1. 1.University of WarwickUK
  2. 2.University of BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations