Abstract
Triptyque is arguably Claude Simon’s most accomplished work; the product of the author’s masterly sense of formal control and literary innovation. Its crystalline structure, a source of infinite pleasure for the reader who pursues its internal echoes and vibrations, will surely earn Triptyque recognition as a landmark in the evolution of the modern novel. Yet to call it a ‘landmark’ is already to adopt a critical terminology which has the unfortunate effect of implying that a work of language is a topographical object.
Long before there were people on the earth, crystals were already growing in the earth’s crust. On one day or another, a human being first came across such a sparkling morsel of regularity lying on the ground or hit one with his tool and it broke off and fell at his feet, and he picked it up and regarded it in his open hand, and he was amazed.
M. C. Escher, ‘Approaches to Infinity’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and Reference
Kurt Koffka, Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York, 1935), p. 25.
David Sylvester, Interviews with Francis Bacon (London, 1975), p. 78. Bacon describes the images in his paintings as ‘organic form that relates to the human image but is a complete distortion of it’, p. 8.
Jean Ricardou, Le Nouveau roman (Paris, 1973), pp. 124–30.
Copyright information
© 1988 Michael J. Evans
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, M. (1988). Triptyque: Topography or Topology?. In: Claude Simon and the Transgressions of Modern Art. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19471-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19471-1_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19473-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19471-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)