Skip to main content
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

One of the more popular literary clichés among French Romantic writers, ‘soleil noir’, recurs in modified form in the stanza from Valéry’s ‘Le Cimetière Marin’ serving as epigraph to the first part of La Bataille de Pharsale: ‘Ah! le soleil…. Quelle ombre de tortue’. The image is accompanied by two other contradictory locutions, ‘Qui vibre, vole et qui ne vole pas!’ and ‘Achille immobile à grands pas!’ which echo Zeno’s paradoxes depicting immobility through movement.1 In one argument, Achilles is said to be incapable of overtaking the tortoise who begins the race with a headstart, since in order to catch up with him he must first cross each of the points reached by the tortoise. Although the distance between the two runners contracts, it remains ineradicable. According to the second paradox, an arrow can only occupy one place at any moment during its flight and is therefore motionless. Progression, seen in the light of this ‘reductio ad absurdum’ process of reasoning, is inhibited by spatio-temporal decomposition and division; movement is stifled in its very attempt. Valéry’s metaphor of the sun as the tortoise’s shadow blends the Romantic cliché with the narrative of Zeno’s conundrum, with the result that the paradoxical image, set within the context of the poem’s oscillation between movement and stasis, active life and contemplative death, now reflects the latter, the interstice of timeless immobility.

Why, again, have all the constellations, save only Orion with his sworded thigh, strayed from their courses to move unseen through the skies; and why does Orion blaze brighter than usual?

Lucan, Pharsalia

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and Reference

  1. Jean Ricardou, Pour une théorie du nouveau roman (Paris, 1971), pp. 124–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephen Ullmann, The Image in the Modern French Novel (London, 1960), p. 229;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gérard Genette, Figures III (Paris, 1972), p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  4. a reading which acts, which writes’. Jean Ricardou, ‘Esquisse d’une théorie des générateurs’ in Positions et oppositions sur le roman contemporain (Paris, 1971), p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicole Bothorel, Francine Dugast, Jean Thoraval, Les Nouveaux romanciers (Paris, 1976), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Michael J. Evans

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, M. (1988). La Bataille de Pharsale and its Fragments. In: Claude Simon and the Transgressions of Modern Art. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19471-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics