Skip to main content

Abstract

The new politics of the 1970s spawned many new political movements and political programmes across the whole political spectrum. The most powerful and influential of these new forces has been labelled the New Right, although many question whether it is new and a few who find themselves labelled ‘New Right’ question if it is right. What the term certainly does not signify is either a unified movement or a coherent doctrine. A wide range of groups and ideas make up the New Right, and there are many internal divisions and conflicts.’ The most important division, which is explored in this chapter, is between a liberal and a conservative tendency.

Surely it is high time for us to cry from the rooftops that the intellectual foundations of socialism have all collapsed.

[F. A. Hayek]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. There is a rich and growing literature on the New Right. See especially Ruth Levitas (ed.) The Ideology of the New Right (Cambridge: Polity, 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gillian Peele, Revival and Reaction: the Right in Contemporary America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Norman Barry, The New Right (London: Croom Helm, 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Desmond King, The New Right (London: Macmillan, 1987); and

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Green, The New Right (London: Wheat-sheaf, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For typical writing on this theme see Robert Moss, The Collapse of Democracy (London: Temple Smith, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For an initial exploration of this idea see ‘The Free Economy and the Strong State’, in R. Miliband and J. Saville (eds) Socialist Register 1979 (London: Merlin, 1979) pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. One of the best analyses of the internal tensions in New Right thinking can be found in Patrick Dunleavy and Brendan O’Leary, Theories of the State (London: Macmillan, 1987) ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Roger Scruton, The Meaning of Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Ferdinand Mount, The Subversive Family (London: Jonathan Cape, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a succinct summary see Alec Chrystal, Controversies in Macroeconomics (London: Philip Allan, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. For one of the best analyses of the international economic order see E. A. Brett, International Money and Capitalist Crisis (London: HEB, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Milton Friedman, Inflation and Unemployment (London: IEA, 1977) and Bosanquet, After the New Right.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See M. Kalecki, ‘Political Aspects of Full Employment’, Political Quarterly, 14 (1943) pp. 322–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. For the main themes of Hayek’s writings see Norman Barry, Hayek’s Social and Economic Philosophy (London: Macmillan, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See W. Rees-Mogg, The Reigning Illusion (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See F. A. Hayek, Denationalisation of Money (London: IEA, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. This has been put forward in a paper by Kevin Dowd, ‘The State and the Monetary System’ (Fraser Institute, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See the discussion by Bosanquet in After the New Right. A representative supply side text is B. Bartlett and T. P. Roth (eds) The Supply Side Solution (London: Macmillan, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See the criticism by George Gilder, one of the leading American supply siders, in the preface to the English edition of Wealth and Poverty (London: Buchan & Enright, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. For the inter-war debates on the feasibility of socialism see F. A. Hayek (ed.) Collectivist Economic Planning (London: Routledge, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert Nozick is professor of philosophy at Harvard, best known for his Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Milton Friedman, ‘The line we dare not cross’, Encounter (November 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  24. For an analysis of the public choice school see Bosanquet, After the New Right, ch. 4, and

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buchanan J. et al., The Economics of Politics (London: IEA, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Nozick’s positions are criticised in several of the contributions to J. Paul (ed.) Reading Nozick (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. For the extreme Austrian position see Murray Rothbard, Power and Market (Kansas City: Sheed Andrews & McMeel, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  28. The analysis of the new class has been developed particularly by the American neo-conservatives such as Irving Kristol. See I. Kristol, Two Cheers for Capitalism (New York: Basic Books, 1978) and Peele, Revival and Reaction.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Representative examples of conservative New Right writing are Roger Scruton, The Meaning of Conservatism; Maurice Cowling (ed.) Conservative Essays (London: Cassell, 1978); and

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rhodes Boyson, Centre Forward (London: Temple Smith, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  31. The impact of the cold war on postwar politics is emphasised by Phil Armstrong, Andrew Glyn and John Harrison, Capitalism since World War II (London: Fontana, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Those who moved right in the 1950s included the former Trotskyists such as Irving Kristol, and former Communists such as Alfred Sherman. There was a further wave later among those repudiating social democracy. See, for example, Patrick Cormack, Right Turn: Eight Men who changed their minds (London: Leo Cooper, 1978). The eight included Max Beloff, Lord Chalfont, Paul Johnson, Reg Prentice and Hugh Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The origins and course of the new cold war are traced by Fred Halliday, The Making of the Second Cold War (London: Verso, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moss, The Collapse of Democracy, is a good guide to subversion. See also the publications of the Freedom Association, and Brian Crozier’s Institute for the Study of Conflict. The flavour and tone of this literature can be sampled in Brian Crozier, Socialism: Dream and Reality (London: Sherwood, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Colin Leys in Politics in Britain (London: HEB, 1983) ch. 15, analyses right-wing scenarios of political collapse.

    Google Scholar 

  37. The ideas and politics of the American New Right has been analysed by Mike Davis in ‘The Political Economy of Late-Imperial America’, New Left Review, 143 (1984) pp. 6–38; and

    Google Scholar 

  38. ‘Reaganomics’ Magical Mystery Tour’, New Left Review, 149 (1985) pp. 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Andrew Gamble

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gamble, A. (1988). The New Right. In: The Free Economy and the Strong State. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19438-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics