Abstract
‘Peace’ and ‘socialism’ are the twin core values of Soviet ideology.1 World socialism was for Lenin the absolute value, and efficacy in advancing it the yardstick of all policy. Among relative values, subsidiary to socialism, in the Bolshevik outlook, peace soon came to occupy first place. Following early disillusionment with the strategy of revolutionary war, it was established as axiomatic that avoiding involvement in large-scale war was essential to the security of the Soviet state and to the cause of which that state was the bastion. This goal motivated both the search for collective security in the 1930s and the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939–41. The experience of the Nazi invasion, of course, confirmed its vital importance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Raymond L. Garthoff, Détente and Confrontation: American—Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan ( Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1985 ), pp. 768–85
S. D. Shenfield, ‘Soviet thinking about the unthinkable’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol.41 no. 2 (Feb. 1985), pp,. 23–5.
Perhaps the most revealing testimony is that of Arkady N. Shevchenko, Breaking with Moscow (London: Jonathan Cape, 1985), e.g. pp. 104–5, 180, 190, 280–1.
R. Judson Mitchell, Ideology of a Superpower: Contemporary Soviet Doctrine on International Relations ( Stanford, Cal.: Hoover Institution Press, 1982 ), p. 5.
Jerry F. Hough, The Struggle for the Third World: Soviet Debates and American Options ( Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1986 ), pp. 267–8.
Other useful studies of Soviet international relations scholarship, containing discussion of problems of interpretation, are: William Zimmerman, Soviet Perspectives on International Relations 1956–1967 (Princeton University Press, 1969)
and Neil Malcolm, Soviet Political Scientists and American Politics ( London: Macmillan, 1984 ).
For analyses of the Soviet ideology of détente in the 1970s, see Peter M. E. Volten, Brezhnev’s Peace Program: a Study of Soviet Domestic Political Process and Power (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1982) and Garthoff, Détente and Confrontation, pp. 36–53.
See ‘A Debate Between Raymond Garthoff and Richard Pipes on Soviet Nuclear Strategy’, in P. E. Haley et al. (eds), Nuclear Strategy, Arms Control, and the Future (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1985), pp. 169–79.
N. M. Nikol’sky and A. V. Grishin, Nauchno-tekhnicheskii progress i mezhdunarodyne otnosheniya (Moscow, 1978 ), pp. 71–3.
A. S. Milovidov and Ye. A. Zhdanov, ‘Sotsial’no-filosofskie problemy voiny i mira’, Voprosy filosofii, 1980, no. 10, p. 32.
G. Shakhnazarov, Sotsializm i budushchee (Moscow, 1983), pp. 346–50.
Milovidov and Zhdanov, ‘Sotsial’no-filosofskie problemy’. See also, for example, V. P. Filatov, ‘Vneshnyaya politika KPSS i mirovoi revolyutsionnyi protsess’, in Problemy kommunisticheskogo dvizheniya. Ezhegodnik ( Moscow: Institut Obshchestvennykh Nauk, 1982 ), p. 19.
Shakhnazarov, Sotsializm i budushchee, pp. 309–10, 319; G. Shakhnazarov, ‘Logika politicheskogo myshleniya v yadernuyu eru’, Voprosy filosofii, 1984, no. 5, p. 68.
G. Shakhnazarov, ‘Ideya mirovogo poryadka v sovremennykh kontseptsiyakh mira’, Problemy mira i sotsial’nogo progressa v sovremennoi filosofii (Moscow, 1983), p. 73.
A. Arbatov, Voenno-strategicheskii paritet i politika SShA (Moscow, 1984), pp. 148–50.
V. V. Zhurkin, ‘Respublikanskaya administratsiya: formirovanie voennopoliticheskoi strategii’, SShA, 1981, no. 11, p. 4.
G. A. Trofimenko, ‘Strategicheskie metaniya Vashingtona’, SShA, 1980, no. 12, p. 52.
V. O. Pechatnov, ‘Chto pokazali vybory’, SShA, 1980, no. 12, p. 47.
A. Bovin, The Observer, 24 April 1983.
G. Arbatov, The Dream World of American Policy ( Moscow: Novosti, 1982 ).
A. Yakovlev, ‘Rakovaya opukhol’ imperskikh ambitsii v yadernyi vek’, Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1984, no. 1, p. 3.
G. A. Trofimenko, ‘Osnovnye postulaty vneshnei politiki SShA i sud’by razryadki’, SShA, 1981, no. 7, p. 3.
G. A. Arbatov and W. Oltmans, Cold War or Détente? The Soviet Viewpoint ( London: Zed Books, 1983 ), p. 5.
A. Yakovlev, ‘Zakusivshie udila’, Izvestiya, 7 October 1983.
A. Yakovlev, ‘Confrontation is anomaly in international relations’, Twentieth Century and Peace, 1985, no. 2, p. 24.
D. Tomashevsky and V. Lukov, ‘Interesy chelovechestva i mirovaya politika’, Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1985, no. 4, p. 17; see also O. Bykov, ‘Revolyutsionnaya teoriya izbavleniya chelovechestva of voin’, ibid., 1983, no. 4, p. 3.
See F. Burlatsky, Planning of World Peace: Utopia or Reality? ( Moscow: Novosti, 1970 ).
I Mikhailov, ‘Mir v 2017-m’, Literaturnaya gazeta, 7 November 1984.
F. Burlatsky, ‘Filosofiya mira’, Obshchestvennye nauki, 1986, no. 1, p. 56; see also Burlatsky, Planning, pp. 1–2.
F. Burlatsky, ‘Otvetstvennost’ rukovoditelei’, Literaturnaya gazeta, 5 October 1983.
L. Mitrokhin, ‘Khristianstvo i bor’ba za mir’, Voprosy filosofii, 1984, no. 11, p. 79; Tomashevsky and Lukov, Interesy chelovechestva’.
O. N. Melikyan, ‘Reshayushchii vybor’, Rabochii klass i sovremennyi mir, 1983, no. 6, p. 11.
Yu. A. Zhilin, ‘Bezopasnost’ v yadernyi vek’, Rabochii klass i sovremennyi mir, 1984, no. 2, p. 9.
I. D. Ivanov, ‘Amerikanskie korporatsii i militarizm’, SShA, 1986, no. 2, p. 14. For another discussion, see SShA, 1984, no. 3, p. 18.
V. M. Gavrilov and S. V. Patrushev, ‘Bor’ba protiv gonki vooruzhenii kak faktor razvitiya’, Latinskaya Amerika, 1984, no. 2, p. 5.
V. V. Kortunov, Strategiya mira protiv yadernogo bezumiya (Moscow, 1984 ), p. 136.
Interview with R. Kosolapov, Literaturnaya gazeta, 1 February 1984.
E. Genri, ‘Kto za vozvrat v kamennyi vek?’, Literaturnaya gazeta, 4 July 1984.
A. Krivitsky, ‘Teni Dantona ada’, Literaturnaya gazeta, 7 March 1984.
F. Burlatsky, ‘1984-i god: Chto on gotovit chelovechestvu?’, Literaturnaya gazeta, 4 January 1984.
T. T. Timofeev, ‘Imperializm, antivoennye dvizheniya i ideologicheskaya bor’ba’, Rabochii klass i sovremennyi mir, 1984, no. 1, p. 18.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shenfield, S. (1988). The Long and Winding Road: Trajectories to Peace and Socialism in Contemporary Soviet Ideology. In: White, S., Pravda, A. (eds) Ideology and Soviet Politics. Studies in Russia and East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19335-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19335-6_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-43910-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19335-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)