Advertisement

Standardising Production and Consumption, 1915–25

  • John Izod

Abstract

During the decade that followed the introduction of the feature film, the movie business, as we have seen, ceased to comprise firms that were very much the creation of an individual who remained in touch with, and controlled directly, all that he had set up. Instead companies grew so large, employed so many staff, and directed their activities so widely both in territory and in the range of their business, that they became corporate enterprises. In the process they lost a good deal of their freedom to act on the impulse of their owners. Now they began to find themselves obliged to respect various requirements of their new financial partners, the bankers and brokers, including in particular the maintenance of profitability. Since large corporations have commitments to ongoing expenditure which they cannot without difficulty shed (commitments among other things to salaries and wages, rents and rates, power bills, depreciation and maintenance), they have to ensure that they bring in as a matter of routine at least sufficient income to meet these obligations.

Keywords

Standardise Production Film Industry Feature Film American Industry Overseas Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Richard Dyer, Stars (London: British Film Institute, 1979) passim.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    I. G. Edmonds, Big U: Universal in the Silent Days (London: Thomas Yoseloff, 1977) p. 36.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Robert McLaughlin, Broadway and Hollywood (New York: Arno Press, 1974) pp. 53–65.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    Janet Staiger, ‘“Tame” Authors and the Corporate Laboratory: Stories, Writers, and Scenarios in Hollywood’, Quarterly Review of Film Studies, 8, 4 (Fall 1983) pp. 37–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 17.
    Albert E. Smith, Two Reels and a Crank (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1952) pp. 251–2.Google Scholar
  6. 20.
    William K. Everson, American Silent Film (New York: Oxford UP, 1978) p. 100.Google Scholar
  7. 36.
    Charles Eckert, ‘The Carole Lombard in Macy’s Window’, Quarterly Review of Film Studies 3, 1 (Winter 1978) p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 38.
    Garth Jowett, ‘Bullets, Beer and the Hays Office: Public Enemy (1931)’, in John E. O’Connor and Martin A. Jackson, American Historyl American Film (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1979) p. 61.Google Scholar
  9. 43.
    Arthur F. McClure (ed.), The Movies: An American Idiom (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 1971) pp. 122–6.Google Scholar
  10. 44.
    Neville March Hunnings, Film Censors and the Law (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1967) pp. 153–4.Google Scholar
  11. 46.
    Raymond Moley, The Hays Office (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1945) pp. 58–9.Google Scholar
  12. 52.
    Murray Ross, Stars and Strikes (1941) (New York: AMS Press, 1967) p. 214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kenneth John Izod 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Izod
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Film and Media StudiesUniversity of StirlingUK

Personalised recommendations