Abstract
Although historically the pedigree for the modern role of professional comedian is about a hundred years old,1 there is very much less appreciation of his role in terms of the mutual expectations of his behaviour in interaction with other significant role players, especially his audience in contemporary society. At the very least, of course, in the consistency of his orientation to his audience, the comedian is expected to make them laugh. We can, then, say simply that the role of professional comedian is to elicit or invoke laughter in other persons by telling jokes about subjects, objects, or human situations which his listeners can cognise or perceive as being humorous. This role, in fact, can better be seen as consisting of a range of role-types as indicated by the designations of ‘comedian’, ‘clown’, ‘satirist’, etc., in its more professional or occupational guise. (see Table 10.1 below).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Anon., ‘The Benny factor’, New Society, 21 May 1981, p. 299.
H. Bergson, ‘Laughter’, in W. Sypher (ed.) Comedy ( New York: Doubleday, 1956 ) p. 143.
A. Koestler, The Act of Creation ( London: Hutchinson, 1964 ) p. 35.
A. Brien, ‘Volga Jokemen’, Sunday Times, 23 September 1973.
D. Handelman and B. Kapferer, ‘Forms of Joking Activity: A Comparative Approach’, American Anthropologist, vol. 74 (1972) p. 484.
L. Hudson, ‘Life as Art’, New Society, 12 February 1976, p. 319.
A. Berger, ‘What Makes People Laugh? Cracking the Cultural Code’, ETC (A Review of General Semantics), vol. 32 (1975) pp. 427–8.
A. Dundes, ‘Projection in Folklore: A Plea for Psychoanalytic Semiotics’, MLN, vol. 91 (1976) p. 1503.
Aristedes, ‘Jokes and Their Relation to the Conscious’, American Scholar, vol. 47 (1978) p. 306.
R. Bauman, ‘Verbal Art as Performance’, American Anthropologist, vol. 77 (1975) p. 306.
H. Pollio and J. Edgerly, ‘Comedians and Comic Style’, in T. Chapman and H. Foot (eds) Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications ( London: John Wiley, 1976 ) p. 230.
H. Duncan, Communication and the Social Order ( London: Oxford University Press, 1970 ) p. 389.
G. Gordon, Persuasion: The Theory and Practice of Manipulative Communication ( New York: Hastings House, 1971 ) p. 319.
R. Stephenson, ‘Conflict and Control Functions of Humour’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 56 (1951) p. 570.
E. Goffman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969 ) p. 11.
A. Granfield and H. Giles, ‘Towards an Analysis of Humour Through Symbolism’, International Journal of Symbology, vol. 6 (1975) p. 18.
R. Perry, Realms of Value ( New York: Greenwood Press, 1968 ) p. 139.
A. Zijderveld, ‘Jokes and Their Relation to Social Reality’, Social Research, vol. 35 (1968) p. 287.
E. Midwinter, Make Em Laugh: Famous Comedians and their Worlds ( London: George Allen and Unwin, 1979 ) pp. 176–90.
L. Dawson, The Les Dawson Joke Book ( London: Arrow Books, 1979 ).
C. Winick, ‘A Content Analysis of Orally Communicated Jokes’, The American Imago, vol. 20 (1963) pp. 271–91.
S. Milligan, More Goon Show Scripts ( London: Sphere Books, 1974 ).
J. Waterman, ‘Walk Back with Milligan’, The Listener, 13 April 1978, pp. 465–6.
A. Berger, ‘Anatomy of the Joke’, Journal of Communication, vol. I (1976) pp. 113–15.
C. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, The New Rhetorica: A Treatise on Argument ( Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969 ) p. 330.
A. Draper, The Story of the Goons ( London: Everest Books, 1978 ) p. 179.
J. Fisher, Funny Way to be a Hero ( London: Paladin, 1976 ) p. 241.
E. Goffman, Forms of Talk ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981 ) pp. 78–122.
M. Wood, ‘Kinds of madmen’, New Society, 5 April 1973, p. 26.
J. Bronowski, The Western Intellectual Tradition from Leonardo to Hegel ( London: Hutchinson, 1960 ) p. 252.
C. Gruner, Wit and Humour in Mass Communication’, in T. Chapman and H. Foot (eds) Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications ( London: John Wiley, 1976 ) p. 288.
T. Nagel, ‘The Absurd’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68 (1971) p. 718.
H. LeFebvre, Everyday Life in the Modern World ( London: Allen Lane, 1971 ) pp. 139–40.
Cited in D. Nathan, The Laughtermakers: A Quest for Comedy ( London: Peter Owen, 1971 ) p. 50.
see S. Castagna, ‘Oh You, Naughty Phoneme!’, La Linguistique, vol. 15 (1979) pp. 31–42.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Chris Powell and George E. C. Paton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paton, G.E.C. (1988). The Comedian as Portrayer of Social Morality. In: Powell, C., Paton, G.E.C. (eds) Humour in Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19193-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19193-2_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-44071-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19193-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)