Cultural Difference and Cultural Deprivation: A Theoretical Framework for Differential Intervention
The theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability (SCM) (Feuerstein, 1977; 1979, 1980; Feuerstein and Jensen, 1980; Feuerstein, Jensen, Hoffman and Rand, 1985) identifies as ‘culturally different’ individuals or groups who have benefitted from learning experiences whereby their culture was mediated to them. It identifies as ‘culturally deprived’ those who have not been inducted into their own culture due to the inadequate provision of such learning experiences. Drawing on the paradigm of the Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) this chapter analyses the etiology of cultural difference and cultural deprivation and examines the implications of this distinction for the development of differential approaches to the educational intervention required for the individual confronting the need to adapt and change.
KeywordsCultural Difference Direct Exposure Cultural Transmission Mental Operation Dynamic Assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Feuerstein, R. (1977), ‘Mediated Learning Experience: A Theoretical Basis for Cognitive Modifiability During Adolescence’ in P. Mittler (ed.), Research to Practice in Mental Retardation, Education and Training, Volume Il, (University Park Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
- Feuerstein, R. (1979), Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques, (Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company).Google Scholar
- Feuerstein, R. (1980), Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability, (Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company).Google Scholar
- Feuerstein, R., Jensen, M. R., Hoffman, M. B., Rand, Y. (1985), ‘Instrumental Enrichment. An Intervention Program for Structural Cognitive Modifiability: Theory and Practice’ in J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, R. Glaser (eds), Thinking and Learning Skills, Vol. 1, Relating Instruction to Research, 43–82 (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum).Google Scholar
- Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., Jensen, M. R. (1985), Learning Potential Assessment Device: Manual (Experimental Version), (Hadassah WIZO Canada Research Institute, Jerusalem, Israel).Google Scholar
- Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Jensen, M. R., Kaniel, S., Tzuriel, D., Ben Schachar-Segev, N., Mintzker, Y. (in press); ‘Learning Potential Assessment’ in R. E. Bennett and C. A. Maher (eds), Emerging Perspectives on Assessment of Exceptional Children Journal of Special Services in the Schools, 2 (2).Google Scholar
- Jensen, M. R., Feuerstein, R. (in press), ‘Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers with the Learning Potential Assessment Device: From 88 Cultural Difference and Cultural Deprivation Philosophy to Practice’ in C. Lidz (ed.), Dynamic Assessment: Foundations and Fundamentals, (New York, N.Y.: Guilford Press).Google Scholar