Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter, we attempt to set out the reasons why the assessment of learning efficiency is frequently to be preferred to the more traditional forms of assessment widely used hitherto. There are two main directions to the argument. Firstly, traditional assessment procedures are demonstrably unfair to many ethnic minority groups. Secondly, there are sound theoretical reasons, increasingly backed by research evidence, for believing that the assessment of learning efficiency is more relevant to the determination of the appropriate educational provision for a child than are traditional procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anastasi, A. (1976), Psychological Testing, 4th edn (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A., Foley, J. P. (1949), Differential Psychology (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argulewich, E. N., Sanchez, D. T. (1983), ‘The special education evaluation process as a moderator of false positives’, Exceptional Children, 49, 5, 452–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1981), ‘Cultural systems and cognitive styles’ in Friedman, M. P., Das, J. P., O’Connor, N. (eds), Intelligence and Learning (New York: Plenum Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, P. M., Manni, J. L., Winnikur, D. W. (1983), ‘Implications of ethnic disproportion in programs for the educable mentally retarded’, Journal of Special Education, 17, 3, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966), ‘On cognitive growth’ in Bruner, J. S., Oliver, R., Greenfield, P. M., Studies in Cognitive Growth (London: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budoff, M. (1967), ‘Learning potential among institutionalised young adult retardates’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 404–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budoff, M. (1969), ‘Learning potential: a supplementary procedure for assessing the ability to reason’, Seminars in Psychiatry, 1, 278–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, R. (1973), ‘Verbal abstracting performance of low SES children: an exploration of Jensen’s theory of Mental Retardation’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., Horn, J. L. (1981), ‘On the scientific basis of ability testing’, American Psychologist, 36, 10, 1012–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1965), The Scientific Analysis of Personality (Harmondsworth: Pengu in Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coard, B. (1971), How the West Indian Child is made Educationally Subnormal in the British School System (London: New Beacon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J. A., Sharp, D. W. (1971), The Cultural Content of Learning and Thinking: An Exploration Experimental Anthropology (New York: Bane Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (1972), Statistics in Education, vol 1 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (1983), Assessments and Statements of Special Educational Needs, Circular 1/83 (London: DES).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J. B., Salvia, J., Tucker, J., Ysseldyke, J. (1981), ‘Non biased assessment: A need for operationalism’, Exceptional Children, 47, 6, 427–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, C., Blachford, P., Burke, J., Plewis, I., Tizard, B. (1983), ‘A comparison of the views of parents and reception teachers’. An adaptation of a paper presented to the British Psychological Society’s London Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G. A. (1954), ‘Learning and human ability’ in Wiseman, S. (ed.), Intelligence and Ability (Harmondsworth: Pengu in Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R. (1968), ‘Learning potential assessment device’ in Richards, B. W. (ed.), Proceedings of the First Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency (Reigate, Surrey: Michael Jackson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R., Hoffman, M., Shalom, H., Kiram, L., Narrol, H., Schachter, E., Katz, D., Rand, Y. (1972), ‘The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: the Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments, and techniques’, Studies in Cognitive Modifiability, report No. 1, vol. 1 (Jerusalem: Hadassah-Wizo- Canada Research Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, R. (1980), Instrumental Enrichment. An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability (Baltimore: University Park Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. (1970), ‘The effects of different levels of enriched stimulus input on the abstracting ability of slow learning children’, unpublished master’s thesis, George Peabody College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. J. (1984), ‘Contemporary psychology in a multicultural society’, Educational and Child Psychology, 1, 1, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghuman, P. A. S. (1974), ‘A cross-cultural study of the basic thinking processes of English “British” Punjabi and indigenous Punjabi boys’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghuman, P. A. S. (1975), The Cultural Context of Thinking (Windsor: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. E., Haywood, H. C. (1969), ‘Input deficit in cultural-familial retardation: effect of stimulus enrichment’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 604–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. M. (1983), ‘The assessment of the learning efficiency of Asian children’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Aston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. M. (1984), ‘The longitudinal predictive validity of the Learning Efficiency Test Battery’, paper presented at the DECP Symposium, on Psychologists and ethnic minority groups at the 1984 Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, held at Warwick University, Coventry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. B. (1963), Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test Manual (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. M. (1971); Educational Assessment of Immigrant Pupils (Slough: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, H. C., Filler, J. W., Shifman, M. A., Chatelanat, G. (1975), ‘Behavioural assessment in mental retardation’, in McReynolds, P. (ed.). Advances in Psychological Assessment, vol. 3 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, S. (1977), Test of Children’s Learning Ability: Individual Version (Slough: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, S., Lucas, D. (1978), Able to Learn? The Pursuit of Culture-Fair Assessment (Slough: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inner London Education Authority (1967), The Education of Immigrant Pupils in Special Schools for ESN Children (London ILEA Report 657, 10 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1961), ‘Learning abilities in Mexican-American and Anglo-American children’, California Journal of Educational Psychology, XII, 4, 147–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1963), ‘Learning ability in retarded, average and gifted children’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behaviour and Development, 9, 2, 123–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, O. G. (1976), Tests and Measurements in Child Development: Handbook II, vol. 2 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L. Jones, J. M. (1985), ‘Assessment and special education of minority and immigrant children in the United States: Issues and developments’. Paper presented at the First Circum-Mediterranean Regional IACCP Conference: Ethnic Minority and Immigrant Research (Malmö: Sweden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, E. (1980), ‘Cognitive development in the acculturation of migrant children: the role of training in the assessment of learning ability’, International Review of Applied Psychology, 29, 1/2, 105–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M., Wilcox, M. R., Gleason, W. P., (1974), The Educationally Retarded Child (New York: Grune and Stratton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, G. W. S., Vernon, P. E. (1963), ‘The measurement of learning ability’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, A. (1980), ‘Are ability tests up to standard?’ Australian Psychologist, 15, 3, 335–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McReynolds, P. (1982), ‘The future of psychological assessment’, International Review of Applied Psychology, 31, 117–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J. (1984), ‘Beyond IQ test bias: the National Academy Panel’s analysis of Minority EMR Overrepresentation’, Educational Researcher, 13, 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. R. (1984), ‘The relative development and educational achievement of ethnic minority children in a Midlands town’, Educational and Child Psychology, 1, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, W. D., Ammon, M. S., Suzuki, N., Levin, J. R. (1971). ‘Population differences and learning proficiency’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 1, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharron, H. (1985), ‘Bridging the culture gap’, Times Educational Supplement, 18 Jan., p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. H. (1973), ‘Newcastle upon Tyne: Asian pupils do better than whites’, British Journal of Sociology, 24, 4, 431–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S., Zibrin, M., Menell, C. (1983), ‘Special education referrals: failure to replicate student-teacher ethnicity interaction’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 5, 705–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, S. (1981), Special Education (London: Harper and Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, S. (1984), Home and School in Multicultural Britain (London: Batsford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, H. E. R. (1971), Immigrant Pupils in England (Slough: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, H. E. R., Brittan, E. M. (1972), Organisation in Multiracial Schools (Slough: NFER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. A. (1980), ‘Ethnic disproportions in classes for the learning disabled issues in non-biased assessment’, Journal of Special Education, 14, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrnchuk, A. J. (1973), ‘Effects of concept familiarization vs. stimulus enhancement on verbal abstracting in institutionalized retarded delinquent boys’, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 551–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1969), Intelligence and Cultural Environment (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1979), Intelligence: Heridity and Environment (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, G. A. de, Hippler A. (1969), ‘Cultural Psychology: comparative studies of human behaviour’ in Lindzey, G., Aronson, E. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. iv (Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, H. M. (1978), Special Educational Needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1949), The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (New York: The Psychological Corporation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilce, H. (1985), ‘Grammar place tests may be biased against minorities’, Times Educational Supplement, 19 July, p.8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Rajinder M. Gupta and Peter Coxhead

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, R.M., Coxhead, P. (1988). Why Assess Learning Potential?. In: Gupta, R.M., Coxhead, P. (eds) Cultural Diversity and Learning Efficiency. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19131-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics