Subject, Body and the Exclusion of Women from Philosophy

  • Joanna Hodge

Abstract

Descartes’s declaration in part 4 of his Discourse on Method: ‘cogito ergo sum’, ‘I think, therefore I am’, installs the theme of subjectivity at the centre of philosophical enquiry for the next three hundred years. Now, however, the usefulness, indeed the availability of a conception of subjectivity is increasingly open to question, from angles as diverse as Derek Parfit’s post-utilitarianism1 and the phenomenological hermeneutics of Martin Heidegger.2 This questioning makes indispensable a critique and reconstruction of the terms of reference of philosophical enquiry, in order to complete the displacement of subjectivity as a central term. That critique and reconstruction will be all the more effective if it can at the same time identify and take into account the way in which certain conceptual structures, for example that of subjectivity, have played a part in the exclusion of women from philosophical enquiry and from the processes of determining the parameters of such enquiry. The critical task of this essay is to show how the concept of the subject, produced in Descartes’s enquiries, has served both to exclude women from philosophy and to obscure how that exclusion has been effected. The positive result will be to show how the displacement of this concept makes it more possible to begin to criticise and dismantle an illegitimate gender specificity, which has been a characteristic feature of the Western philosophical tradition.

Keywords

Sugar Posit Stake Blindness Clarification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. COWARD, Rosalind (1984), Female Desire: Women’s Sexuality Today (London: Paladin).Google Scholar
  2. DALY, Mary (1979), Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism (London: The Women’s Press).Google Scholar
  3. DERRIDA, Jacques (1986), ‘Geschlecht 1’, Cahier de l’Herne, vol. 45, pp. 416–39.Google Scholar
  4. DESCARTES, René (1964–76), Oeuvres de Descartes, 12 vols., ed. Adam and Tannery (Paris: Vrin/CNRS).Google Scholar
  5. DESCARTES, René (1985), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols., ed. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  6. DWORKIN, Andrea (1981), Pornography: Men Possessing Women (London: The Women’s Press).Google Scholar
  7. HEGEL, G. W. F. (1971), Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 20 of Werke, 20 vols. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag). English trans.: Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. E. S. Haldane and Frances H. Simon (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974).Google Scholar
  8. HEIDEGGER, Martin (1962), Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell). (First published 1927).Google Scholar
  9. IRIGARAY, Luce (1974), Speculum de l’autre femme (Paris: Minuit). English trans.: Speculum of the Other Woman, trans. Gillian C. Gill (Ithaca and New York: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  10. IRIGARAY, Luce (1984), Ethique de la différence sexuelle (Paris: Minuit).Google Scholar
  11. JAGGAR, Alison M. (1983), Feminist Politics and Human Nature (Brighton: Harvester).Google Scholar
  12. KAPPELER, Susanne (1986), The Pornography of Representation (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  13. OKIN, Susan Möller (1980), Women in Western Political Thought (London: Virago).Google Scholar
  14. PARFIT, Derek (1986), Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. SNITOW, Ann, STANSELL, Christine and THOMPSON, Sharon (1984), Desire: The Politics of Sexuality (London: Virago).Google Scholar
  16. VANCE, Carole S. (1984), Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  17. WOLLSTONECRAFT, Mary (1970), The Rights of Woman, Everyman series (London: Dent).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Morwenna Griffiths and Margaret Whitford 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Hodge

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations