Skip to main content

The Use of Models for Paired Comparisons with Ties

  • Chapter
Sociometric Research

Abstract

The method of paired comparisons has a long tradition which has been caused not only by its simplicity and statistical elegance, but also by its wide applicability. Among the most important applications are its uses in areas as taste testing, personnel rating, consumer testing, the psychological study of preference and choice behaviour, attitude measurement and tournaments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ANDERSEN, E. B., Discrete Statistical Models with Social Science Applications (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • BEAVER, R. J. and GOKHALE, D. V., ‘A Model to Incorporate Within-pair Order Effects in Paired Comparisons’, Communications in Statistics, 4 (1975) 923–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRADLEY, R. A., ‘Science, Statistics and Paired Comparisons’, Biometrics, 32 (1976) 213–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— and TERRY, M. E., ‘Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Design: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons’, Biometrika, 39 (1952) 324–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOMBS, C. H., A Theory of Data (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Mathesis Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVID, H. A., The Method of Paired Comparisons (London: Griffin, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIDSON, R. R., ‘On Extending the Bradley-Terry Model to Accommodate Ties in Paired Comparison Experiments’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65 (1970) 317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— and BEAVER, R. J., ‘On Extending the Bradley-Terry Model to Incorporate Within-pair Order Effects’, Biometrics, 33 (1977) 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— and FARQUHAR, P. H., ‘A Bibliography on the Method of Paired Comparisons’, Biometrics, 32 (1976) 241–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIJKSTRA, O., ‘Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: A Method of Paired Comparisons Employing Unequal Repetitions on Pairs’, Biometrics, 16 (1960) 176–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FECHNER, G. T., Elemente der Psychophysik (Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1860).

    Google Scholar 

  • FISCHER, G. H., Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests (Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Verlag Hans Huber, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • FORD, L. R. J., ‘Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons’, American Mathematical Monthly, 64 (1957) 241–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLENN, W. A. and DAVID, H. A., ‘Ties in Paired Comparisons Experiments using a Modified Thurstone — Mosteller Method’, Biometrics, 16 (1960) 86–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRIDGEMAN, N. T., ‘Pair Comparison, With and Without Ties’, Biometrics, 15 (1959) 382–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUSTAFSSON, J. E., PML: A Computer Program for Conditional Estimation and Testing in the Rasch Model for Dichotomous Items, Reports from the Institute of Education University of Göteborg, no. 85 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • KOUSGAARD, N., ‘Models for Paired Comparisons With Ties’, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 3 (1976) 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— ‘A Conditional Approach to the Analysis of Data from Paired Comparisons Experiments Incorporating Within-pair Order Effects’, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6 (1979) 154–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDEN, W. J. van der and EGGEN, T. J. H. M., ‘The Rasch Model as a Model for Paired Comparisons with an Individual Tie Parameter’, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCE, R. D., Individual Choice Behavior (New York: Wiley & Sons, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • MOLENAAR, W., ‘Paired Comparisons: Some Models and Tests’, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 15 (1973) 212–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOSTELLER, F., ‘Remarks on the Method of Paired Comparisons: I. The Least Squares Solution assuming Equal Standard Deviations and Equal Correlations’, Psychometrika, 16 (1951) 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEYMAN, J. and SCOTT, E. L., ‘Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations’, Econometrica, 16 (1948) 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAO, P. V. and KUPPER, L. L., ‘Ties in Paired-comparison Experiments: A Generalization of the Bradley-Terry Model’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62 (1967) 194–204 (corrigenda 63, 1550).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RASCH, G., Probability Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Test (Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMSON, W. A. and SINGH, J., ‘The Use of Limit Theorems in Paired Comparison Model Building’, Psychometrika, 32 (1967) 255–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • THURSTONE, L. L., ‘Psychophysical Analysis’, American Journal of Psychology, 38 (1927) 368–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZERMELO, E., ‘Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein Maximum-problem der Warscheinlichkeitsrechnung’, Mathematisch Zeitschrift, 29 (1929) 436–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Willem E. Saris and Irmtraud N. Gallhofer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eggen, T.J.H.M., van der Linden, W. (1988). The Use of Models for Paired Comparisons with Ties. In: Saris, W.E., Gallhofer, I.N. (eds) Sociometric Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19051-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics