Changing the Subject: Authorship, Writing, and the Reader

  • Nancy K. Miller
Part of the Language, Discourse, Society book series (LDS)


I want to begin with a brief account of the circumstances involved in the construction and destination of this paper. For the past few years, I have been putting together a book about women’s writing; more specifically, about the act of reading women’s writing, and what might be at stake—critically, politically, historically—in such a project. Since I work “in French,” and since I am well aware that there is not a women’s writing, my examples (my corpus, as we used to say in the days of high structuralism) come primarily from what I think I can show is a tradition of female authorship in France. To situate my project within the field of French studies, rather than the more heterogeneous world of feminist studies, has meant locating my “problematic” within the discussion of writing and sexual difference that has been taking place on both sides of the Atlantic, in French and English departments, though with the usual jet (and intracontinental) lag, over the past fifteen years.


Feminist Theory Feminist Criticism Feminist Study Woman Writer Female Authorship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    Michel Foucault, “What Is an Author?” in Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault, ed. Donald F. Bouchard ( Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1980 ), p. 120.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Roland Barthes, Sade/Fourier/Loyola, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1976 ), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Naomi Schor, Breaking the Chain: Women, Theory, and French Realist Fiction ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1985 ), p. 127.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Andreas Huyssen, “Mapping the Postmodern,” New German Critique, no. 33 (Fall 1984), p. 44.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Elaine Showalter, “Women Who Write Are Women,” New York Times Book Review, December 16, 1984, p. 33.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Donna Haraway, “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s,” Socialist Review, no. 80 (May-April 1985), pp. 84–85.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    Hélène Cixous, “The Laugh of the Medusa,” Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1, no. 4 (Summer 1976):879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 11.
    Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction ( Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1982 ), p. 64.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Adrienne Rich, On Lies, Secrets, and Silence; Selected Prose, 1966–1979 ( New York: Norton, 1979 ), p. 39.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    Adrienne Rich, “Blood, Bread, and Poetry: The Location of the Poet,” Massachusetts Review (1984), p. 536.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Charlotte Brontë, Villette [1853] (New York: Penguin, 1983 ), pp. 493–95.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    Gayatri Chakravorti Spivak, “The Politics of Interpretations,” Critical Inquiry 9 (September 1982): 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 24.
    See Teresa de Lauretis, Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 27.
    Juliet Mitchell, “Psychoanalysis: A Humanist Humanity or a Linguistic Science?” in Women: The Longest Revolution ( New York: Pantheon, 1984 ), p. 241.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Regents of the University of Wisconsin System 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy K. Miller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations