Advertisement

Philosophies of Social Science: The Old and the New

  • William Outhwaite
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Social Theory book series

Abstract

As I said in the introduction, I do not intend in this book to add to the existing literature on positivist philosophies of science. We need, however, to look at them briefly in order to set the scene for the growth of the hermeneutic, critical and realist alternatives. One of the best recent books on positivism distinguishes no fewer than twelve senses of the term.1 For present purposes, however, we can get by with three variants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Halfpenny, Positivism and Sociology.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. T. Buckle, History of Civilisation in England, vol. 1, ch. 1 (London: 1899) (1st edn 1857).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    William Outhwaite, Understanding Social Life, 2nd edn (Lewes: Jean Stroud, 1986) ch. 2 and passim.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Outhwaite, ‘Laws and Explanations in Sociology’.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otto Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A typical example is Richard Rudner, The Philosophy of Social Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1966).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson, 1959), p. 59.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. G. Hempel, ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, Journal of Philosophy vol. 39, 1942, pp. 35–48; reprinted in P. Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History (New York: Free Press, 1959), pp. 344–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hempel, ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, in Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History, p. 352.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., pp. 349 f.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michael Scriven, ‘Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanations’, p. 448, in Gardiner, Theories of History, pp. 443–75.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibid., p. 454.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edmund Mokrzycki, Philosophy of Science and Sociology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983), p. 65.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ibid., p. 4.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    See William Outhwaite, Concept Formation in Social Science (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983), especially p. 6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin Hollis and Edward Nell, Rational Economic Man (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Outhwaite, Concept Formation in Social Science.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alfred Schutz, ‘Choice and the Social Sciences’, in L. Embree (ed.), Life World and Consciousness (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972), especially p. 583. Cf. Outhwaite, Concept Formation, p. 65; Richard Grathoff (ed.), The Theory of Social Action (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peter Winch: The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958), p. 123.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karl-Otto Apel, A nalytic Philosophy of Language and the Geisteswissenschaften (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1967), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    See John Thompson, Critical Hermeneutics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests (London: Heinemann, 1971).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Adorno et al., The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (London: Heinemann, 1976); Anthony Giddens (ed.), Positivism and Sociology (London: Heinemann, 1974).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), p. 118.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alisdair MacIntyre, The Unconscious. A Conceptual Analysis (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karl Popper, ‘Normal Science and its Dangers’, in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), p. 52.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibid., p. 57.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mary Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1963); The Structure of Scientific Inference (London: Macmillan, 1974).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. Harré and E. H. Madden, Causal Powers (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© William Outhwaite 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Outhwaite
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SussexUK

Personalised recommendations