Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychological, Economic and Sociological Models of Voting

  • Chapter
Elections and Voters

Abstract

Is voting an act of affirmation or of choice? This is the fundamental question on which models of voting disagree. In the party identification model, the act of voting is seen as expressive, not instrumental. It is a way of demonstrating a deep seated loyalty to a party. One no more chooses a party than one chooses a religious or national identity. In the rational choice model, by contrast, voters choose the party which comes closest to their own interests, values and priorities. They make rational choices by working out which party is the best means to achieve their ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABRAMSON, P. R. (1983) Political Attitudes in America (San Francisco: Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDERSEN, K. (1979) The Creation of a Democratic Majority 1928–1936 (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BARRY, B. (1970) Sociologists, Economists and Democracy (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BECK, P. (1976) ‘A Socialisation Theory of Partisan Realignment’, in R. Niemi and H. Weisberg (eds), Controversies in American Voting Behaviour (San Francisco: Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • BERELSON, B., LAZARSFELD, P. and MCPHEE, W. (1954) Voting (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BORRE, O. (1984) ‘Critical Electoral Change in Scandinavia’ in R. Dalton, S. Flanagan and P. Beck (eds), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUDGE, I., CREWE, I. and FARLIE, D. (eds) (1976) Party Identification and Beyond (London: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUDGE, I. and FARLIE, D. (1977) Voting and Party Competition (London: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUDGE, I. and FARLIE, D. (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, D. and STOKES, D. (1974) Political Change in Britain (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAIN, B. and FEREJOHN, I. (1981) ‘Party Identification in the United States and Great Britain’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 14, pp. 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, A., CONVERSE, P., MILLER, W. E. and STOKES, D. (1960) The American Voter (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, A., CONVERSE, P., MILLER, W. E. and STOKES, D. (1966) Elections and the Political Order (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARMINES, E. G. and STIMSON, J. A. (1980) ‘The Two Faces of Issue Voting’, American Political Science Review, vol. 74, pp. 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLARKE, H. D. and CZUDNOWSKI, M. M. (eds) (1987) Political Elites in Anglo-American Democracies (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • CONVERSE, P. (1969) ‘Of Time and Partisan Stability’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 2, pp. 139–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CREWE, I. (1976) ‘Party Identification Theory and Political Change in Britain’, in I. Budge, I. Crewe and D. Farlie (eds), Party Identification and Beyond (London: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • CREWE, I. (1984) ‘The Electorate’ in H. Berrington (ed.), Change in British Politics (London: Cass).

    Google Scholar 

  • CREWE, I. (1985) ‘Introduction’, in I. Crewe and D. Denver (eds), Electoral Change in Western Democracies (Beckenham: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • CREWE, I. and DENVER, D. (eds) (1985) Electoral Change in Western Democracies (Beckenham: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • DALTON, R., FLANAGAN, S. and BECK, P. (eds) (1984) Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • DECLERCQ, E., HURLEY, T. L. and LUTTBERG, N. R. (1976) ‘Voting in American Presidential Elections’, in S. A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behaviour (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • DOWNS, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • DUNLEAVY, P. and HUSBANDS, C. (1985) British Democracy at the Crossroads (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • ENELOW, J. and HINICH, M. (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting: an Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • FIORINA, M. (1977) ‘An Outline of a Model of Party Choice’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 21, pp. 601–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FIORINA, M. (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • FRANKLIN, M. N. (1985) The Decline of Class Voting (Oxford: University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTWIG, F., JENKINS, W. R. and TEMCHIN, E. M. (1980) ‘Variability in Electoral Behaviour’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 24, pp. 553–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HILL, D. B. and LUTTBEG, N. R. (1983) Trends in American Electoral Behaviour, 2nd edn (New York: Peacock).

    Google Scholar 

  • HIMMELWEIT, H. T., HUMPHREYS, P. and JAEGER, M. (1981, 1985) How Voters Decide (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • JACKSON, J. E. (1975a) ‘Issues, Party Choices and Presidential Votes’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 19, pp. 161–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JACKSON, J. E. (1975b) ‘Issues and Party Alignment’, in L. Maisel and P. M. Sacks (eds), The Future of Political Parties (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • JENNINGS, M. and NIEMI, R. (1974) The Political Character of Adolescence (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • KEY, V. (1966) The Responsible Electorate (New York: Vintage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LAZARSFELD, P., BERELSON, B. and GAUDET, H. (1944) The People’s Choice (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • LE DUC, L. and CLARKE, H. (1984) ‘Partisan Instability in Canada: Evidence from a New Panel Study’, American Political Science Review, vol. 78, pp. 470–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LIPSET, S. M. (1985) ‘The Elections, the Economy and Public Opinion: 1984’, Political Studies, vol. 18, pp. 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIPSET, S. M. and ROKKAN, S. (eds) (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • MCDONOUGH, P. and PINU, A. (1984) ‘Continuity and Change in Spanish Politics’, in R. Dalton, S. Flanagan and P. Beck (eds) Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLEAN, I. (1982) Dealing in Votes (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARKUS, G. and CONVERSE, P. (1979) ‘A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice’, American Political Science Review, vol. 73, pp. 1055–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARKUS, G. (1982) ‘Political Attitudes during an Election Year: a Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study’, American Political Science Review, vol. 76, pp. 538–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEEHL, P. (1977) ‘The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument’, American Political Science Review, vol. 71, pp. 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1980) ‘What was the Profit in Following the Crowd? The Effectiveness of Party Strategies on Immigration and Devolution’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 10, pp. 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1983) ‘The Denationalization of British Politics: the Reemergence of the Periphery’, in H. Berrington (ed.), Change in British Politics (London: Cass).

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, W. L. (1987) ‘Dealignment at the Top: The Nature, Origins and Consequences of Labour’s Crisis’, in H. D. Clarke and M. M. Czudnowski (eds), Political Elites in Anglo-American Democracies (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIE, N. S., VERBA, S. and PETROCIK, J. (1976, 1979) The Changing American Voter (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIEMI, R. and WEISBERG, H. (eds) (1976, 1984) Controversies in Voting Behaviour (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly).

    Google Scholar 

  • NORPOTH, H. (1978) ‘Party Identification in West Germany’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 11, pp. 36–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • NORPETH, H. and RUSK, J. (1982) ‘Partisan Dealignment in the American Electorate: Itemising the Deductions since 1964’, American Political Science Review, vol. 76, pp. 522–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAGE, B. I. and JONES, C. C. (1979) ‘Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote’, American Political Science Review, vol. 73, pp. 1071–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PETROCIK, J. (1980) ‘Contextual Sources of Voting Behaviour: The Changeable American Voter’, in J. Pierce and J. Sullivan (eds), The Electorate Reconsidered (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, D. (1976a) ‘Surrogates for Party Identification in the Rational Choice Framework’, in I. Budge, I. Crewe and D. Farlie (eds), Party Identification and Beyond (London: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, D. (1976b) A Theory of Party Competition (London: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • SARLVIK, B. and CREWE, I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHULMAN, M. A. and POMPER, G. M. (1975) ‘Variability in Electoral Behaviour: Longitudinal Perspectives from Causal Modelling’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 19, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STOKES, D. (1963) ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition’, American Political Science Review, vol. 57, pp. 368–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VERBA, S. and NIE, N. H. (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • WEISBERG, H. (1983) ‘A Multidimensional Conceptualisation of Party Identification’, Political Behaviour, vol. 2, pp. 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Martin Harrop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William L. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1987 Martin Harrop and William L. Miller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrop, M., Miller, W.L. (1987). Psychological, Economic and Sociological Models of Voting. In: Elections and Voters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18912-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation