Advertisement

Hegemony and State Softness: Some Variations in Elite Responses

  • Donald Rothchild

Abstract

Until recently, American political science has been notable for its scant attention to the part played by the state in the policy process. Thus Samuel Huntington, observing the Americans’ general antipathy toward governmental power, comments on ‘the virtual absence of the concept of “the state” in American thought’.1 Such an oversight can be regarded as a serious shortcoming, especially in light of the political forces at work in contemporary Africa. To fail to understand the role of the state in the third world is to fail to gain an insight into the dynamic place of domestic decision-makers in the development process, or their possible role in mediating conflicts and competition among different interests in society.

Keywords

African State State Softness African National Congress District Council Proportionality Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    See the comments of the Federal Permanent Secretaries on the decisions made at the Aburi meeting and reprinted in Robin Luckham, The Nigerian Military ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971 ) pp. 349–55.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Ruth Berins Collier, Regimes in Tropical Africa (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982) p. 114 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Guillermo O’Donnell, ‘Tensions in the Bureaucratic—Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy’, in David Collier (ed.), The New Authoritarianism in Latin America ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979 ) p. 288.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Colonel John Garang de Mabior, Appeal to the Sudanese People on the Founding of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement 3 March 1984, p. 6 (mimeo).Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Issa G. Shivji, ‘Tanzania — The Silent Class Struggle’, in Lionel Cliffe and John Saul (eds), Socialism in Tanzania II (Nairobi: East African Publishing House, 1973 ) pp. 317–21.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    Provisional Military Government of Ethiopia, The Ethiopian Revolution and the Problem in Eritrea (Addis Ababa: Ethiopian Revolutionary Information Center, n.d.) pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    Pauline H. Baker, ‘Obstacles to Private Sector Activities in Africa’, US Congress, House Foreign Affairs Committee, Building Trade With Africa, 98th Congress, 1st session, 19 May and 2 June 1983: p. 223.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    As Foreign Minister Paulo Jorge declared: ‘We do not accept reconciliation of traitors and terrorists’. Africa Report 26, 4 (July-August, 1981): 44–7.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    Aguibou Y. Yansane, Decolonization in West African States With French Colonial Legacy ( Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman Publishing, 1984 ) pp. 140–1.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    These estimates are made by Reginald Green and referred to in Crawford Young, Ideology and Development in Africa ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982 ) p. 106.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Julius K. Nyerere, Decentralisation (Dar es Salaam. Government Printer, 1972) p. 2.Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    Ladipo Adamolekun, Sekou Touré’s Guinea: An Experiment in Nation-Building ( London: Methuen, 1976 ) p. 77.Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    Ekkart Zimmermann, ‘Macro-Comparative Research on Political Protest’, in Ted Robert Gurr (ed.), Handbook of Political Conflict ( New York: Free Press, 1980 ) p. 210.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    In Liberia, a significant limitation upon the democratic process was built into the political system prior to the establishment of party competition. Thus PRC Decree 75A authorized the Special Commission on Elections to refuse to register parties or independent candidates ‘whose members or officers at any time whatsoever have engaged in activities or have otherwise expressed converse and/or adverse ideological aims and objectives that are repugnant to our intrinsic values as a people and our republican form of government’. Quoted in West Africa, 2 July 1984, p. 1334. On the rating scheme used here, see Ivo K. Feierabend and Rosalind L. Feierabend, ‘Systematic Conditions of Political Aggression’, in I. K. Feierabend, R. L. Feierabend and Ted R. Gurr (eds), Anger, Violence and Politics ( Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1972 ) pp. 157–60.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    Victor T. LeVine, ‘Cameroonian Politics: Scholarship and Partisanship’, Africa Today 29, 4 (1982): 58.Google Scholar
  16. 26.
    Robert H. Jackson, ‘Planning, Politics and Administration’, in Goran Hyden, Robert Jackson, and John Okumu (eds), Development Administration: The Kenyan Experience ( Nairobi: Oxford University Press, 1970 ) pp. 177–8.Google Scholar
  17. 28.
    Fernando Henrique Cardoso, ‘On the Characterization of Authoritarian Regimes in Latin America’, in David Collier (ed.), The New Authoritarianism in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979) p, 38.Google Scholar
  18. 30.
    See: D. Rothchild and M. Foley, “African States and the Politics of Inclusive Coalitions”, in D. Rothchild and N. Chazan (eds.), The Precarious Balance: State and Society in Africa ( Boulder, Co.: Westview, 1987 ), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    Summary of discussions, United Nations Seminar on Decentralization for Development, Khartoum, 14–18 September 1981 (New York: United Nations, 1981 ) p. 2.Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    Frank Holmquist, ‘Tanzania’s Retreat from Statism in the Countryside’, Africa Today 30, 4 (1983): 23–35.Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    Julius K. Nyerere, Decentralisation ( Dar es Salaam: Government Printer, 1972 ) p. 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Zaki Ergas 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Rothchild

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations