Efficiency Aspects of Employment and Distribution Policy

  • Peter Bohm


Our discussion so far may be summarised as follows. An economy, which is capable of adjusting quickly to equilibrium positions and in which the actual income distribution is the desired one, does not need any economic policy other than the allocation policy discussed in Chapter 2, that is, policy measures aimed at making the allocation Pareto optimal in equilibrium positions. However, as we indicated in the end of the preceding chapter, adjustments to equilibrium positions are, in reality, often quite slow; chronic unemployment, general or local, is perhaps the most significant example here. Moreover, the actual distribution of real income is often considered to be far off the target. Hence, the government intervenes, in practice, to stabilise employment, etc., as well as to redistribute income. The purpose of this chapter is to analyse efficiency aspects of this kind of government intervention.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boadway, R. and Wildasin, D. (1984). Public Sector Economics, Boston, chapter 11.Google Scholar
  2. (Section 3.2.1) Green, C. (1967). Negative Taxes and the Poverty Problem, Brookings, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. (Section 3.2.3) Bohm, P. (1968). Time horizons and terminal capital, Swedish Journal of Economics, Dec. 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Mishan, E. J. (1982). Cost-Benefit Analysis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Little, I. M. D. and Mirrlees, J. (1974). Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries, London.Google Scholar
  6. Irwin, G. (1978). Modern Cost-Benefit Methods, London.Google Scholar
  7. Pearce, D. and Nash, C. (1981). The Social Appraisal of Projects, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Gramlich, E. (1981). Benefit-Cost Analysis of Government Programs, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter Bohm 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Bohm
    • 1
  1. 1.StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations