Skip to main content

Alternatives within Radio and Television Drama

  • Chapter
Other Theatres

Part of the book series: Communications and Culture

Abstract

The mass media today — radio, cinema and especially television — attracts enormous audiences, many times larger than the followers of experimental theatre. The average viewer in Britain, for example, is supposed to watch something in the region of 22 hours television each week; many children spend more hours in front of the television than they do in school. Virtually everyone has access to one set and many households now have two. Even radio, which is not thought of as a particularly ‘mass’ form of listening, can notch up audiences of 800 000 for its plays — a total which would require many live theatre performances even to approach. Clearly there are implications here for alternative theatre in Britain. Albert Hunt like many others has found that whereas the theatre is remote from the lives of young people, television is ‘taken for granted’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert Hunt The Language of Television (London: Eyre Methuen, 1981) p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See his pamphlet, Art and Culture in Relation to Socialism (London: ILP Publications, 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Val Gielgud, British Radio Drama 1922–1956 (London: Harrap. 1957) p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Angus Calder, The People’s War (London: Panther, 1971) p. 416;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Francis Worsley, ‘Anatomy of ITMA’, in Pilot Papers, vol. 1, no. 1 (January 1946) p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Parker, ‘The Dramatic Actuality of Working-class Speech’ in Wilfried van der Will (ed.), Workers and Writers (Birmingham: conference papers, 1975) p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackie Highe, ‘The Archers’, in Living, 10 July 1985, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ‘The Largest Theatre in the World’, in the Economist, 4 August 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ian Rodger, Radio Drama (London: Macmillan, 1982) p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Malcolm Lynch, ‘Pageants for the People’ in the New Statesman (26 August 1983) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John McGrath, ‘TV Drama: The Case Against Naturalism’ in Sight and Sound, vol. 46, no. 2 (Spring 1977) p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Terry Lovell’s remarks in her essay ‘Ideology and Coronation Street,’ in Richard Dyer (ed.), Coronation Street (London: British Film Institute, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dorothy Hobson, Crossroads (London: Methuen, 1982) p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gillian Skirrow ‘Widows’ in Manuel Alvarado and John Stewart, Made for Television (London: British Film Institute, 1985) p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quoted in Alvarado and Stewart, op. cit., p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edgar, ‘Political Theatre’, op. cit., p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Theodore Shank, American Alternative Theatre (London: Macmillan, 1982) p. 73.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. See Manuel Alvarado and Edward Buscombe, Hazell (London: British Film Institute, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Theodore Shank, ‘Contemporary Political Theatres and their Audiences’, in Das Theater und sein Publikum (Vienna, 1977) p. 296, n. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Philip Purser on Dennis Potter in George Brandt (ed.), British Television Drama (Cambridge University Press, 1981) p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Interview with Griffiths in Theatre Quarterly, vol. VI, no. 22 (Summer 1976) p. 36; and the Leveller, no. 1 (November 1976) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Interview in The Leveller, op. cit., p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mike Poole and John Wyver, Powerplays (London: British Film Institute, 1984) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Wyver, ‘Real Life Stories’ in Time Out (23–9 March 1979) p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Interview with John McGrath in Theatre Quarterly, vol. v, no. 19 (September–November 1975) p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dorothy Hobson, op. cit., p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Graham Murdock, ‘Radical Drama, Radical Theatre’, in Media, Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 2 (April 1980) p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Edward Braun on Trevor Griffiths in George Brandt (ed.), op. cit., p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Poole and Wyver op. cit., p. 179; Stuart Cosgrove, ‘Refusing Consent: the Oi for England Project’, in Screen, vol. 24, no. 1 (January–February 1983) p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Albert Hunt, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Interview with Trevor Griffiths in Marxism Today (May 1985) p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alan Plater, ‘The Wages of Commitment’, in Bob Baker and Neil Harvey, Publishing for People (London: Labour Library, 1985) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quoted in Philip Purser ‘Is the writing on the wall for the TV play?’, in Sunday Telegraph, 24 March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Richard Last, ‘Drama bosses opt for Soap’, in Daily Telegraph, 2 December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stuart Hood, ‘Dilemma of the Communicators’, in C. W. E. Bigsby (ed.), Approaches to Popular Culture (London: Edward Arnold, 1976) p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Andrew Davies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davies, A. (1987). Alternatives within Radio and Television Drama. In: Other Theatres. Communications and Culture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18723-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics