Advertisement

Abstract

On Stalin’s death the Soviet regime faced a host of truly daunting economic difficulties, not the least of which were the behaviour and performance of the industrial workforce. As with industry in general, the problems were structural and systematic. Stalinist industrialisation during the 1930s had created a highly specific system of production relations within the Soviet industrial enterprise (Filtzer, 1986). The combination of dire material scarcity and a chronic labour shortage made discipline difficult to enforce: job changing and absenteeism were high throughout the decade, as workers moved from factory to factory in search of better conditions and felt confident that breaches of discipline regulations would provoke few sanctions from managers desperate not to lose workers. More important was the pattern of worker—manager relations that the labour shortage imposed. Workers, deprived of any possibilities of collective resistance or collective defence of their position, responded by appropriating control over the one area left open to them — the indivdival labour process. Workers retained considerable control over the use of work time. They squandered substantial portions of each shift on personal diversions and took advantage of internal disorganisation (non-arrival of supplies or instructions, inability to find needed tools or parts) to ease the strains of the work regime.

Keywords

Trade Union Piece Worker Labour Shortage Bonus System Labour Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Filtzer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations