Abstract
If a dozen people were stopped in any high street in Great Britain and asked to give a definition of policing, it is likely that most of them would describe the police service as a law enforcement agency, and there the definition would stop. What is also likely is that those people would not be able to give an accurate account of the role of police in society and that most of them would not have given the matter any serious consideration. To many people the word ‘police’ is synonymous with ‘trouble’, and most would rather not be closely associated with the police, although it is still true that opinion polls consistently show the police service to be held in high esteem.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For example, the public’s view of various groups is described by Ben Whitacker, The Police in Society (Sinclair Browne, 1982), p. 212.
Kenneth Oxford, ‘Policing by Consent’, in Scarman and After, edited by John Bunyan (Pergamon Press, 1984).
See Managing the Police: The Challenge, by Bradley, Walker and Wilkie (Wheatsheaf, 1985) p. 143, where the authors point out that many police managers have shown resentment at what they regard as the embezzlement of ideas which they believe belong to Alderson’s colleagues and predecessors.
See also John Alderson, Policing Freedom (Macdonald & Evans, 1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 Ian Oliver
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliver, I. (1987). Introduction. In: Police, Government and Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18557-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18557-3_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-43226-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18557-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)