Advertisement

The Imperial Historian as ‘Colonial Nationalist’: George McCall Theal and the Making of South African History

  • D. M. Schreuder

Abstract

I am here concerned with just such a considered second thought. In particular, the very considered and complex imperial second-thoughts of George McCall Theal (1837–1919), critical pioneer historian of colonial Southern Africa.1 After an extended teaching, administrative and archival career, Theal came from the 1880s to draft a massive multi-volume History of this huge colonial region. Here he set out, in somewhat plain narrative form over the course of nearly 5000 pages, his interpretation of the cumulative European impact on Southern Africa.2 Taking the late 19th century as his personal vantage-point, he portrayed that colonial experience in terms of a unique, emerging ‘new society’ of white ‘civilising’ settlement. Claiming to offer an impartial and scientific account of the making of ‘South Africa’, he in fact developed a highly personal view of that history of imperial contact and conquest. And here his ‘doctrine of imperialism’ — as A. P. Thornton might characterise it3 — ultimately transpired to be a personalised doctrine of ‘colonial nationalism’.4 This particular vision of assertiveness of local identity, based on the white settler community, saw colonial ‘home rule’ as contingent political strategy — contingent upon the cultural unity of the colonists and their place within a wider system of Empire.5

Keywords

European Archive Colonial Naturalist White Settler South African Society African History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    I have relied on the following: A. J. Boeseken, entry on Theal in Dictionary of South African Biography, vol. IV (Pretoria, 1981) pp. 645–8,Google Scholar
  2. and ‘Theal as Baanbreker: 11 April 1837–17 April 1919’, S. A. Argiefblad, I (1959) pp. 33–42;Google Scholar
  3. and ‘Theal en sy Bronne’, Historia (March 1964).Google Scholar
  4. I. D. Bosman pioneered the study of Theal, in his Dr. George McCall Theal as die Geskiedskrywer van South Africa (Amsterdam, f1932).Google Scholar
  5. There is a brief entry on Theal in E. Rosenthal, ed., Southern African Dictionary of National Biography (London, 1966) p. 374, which omits important aspects of detail;Google Scholar
  6. Theal is placed in the context of South African historiography in the valuable essay by L. M. Thompson, in R. W. Winks, ed., The Historiography of the British-Empire-Commonwealth (1966), pp. 212–36.Google Scholar
  7. The British domestic historiography of empire in the ‘Theal years’ is now attracting attention: see, J. G. Greenlee ‘A Succession of Seeleys; the “Old School” Re-examined’, in Journal of Imperial and Commonweath History, IV, 3 (1976) pp. 266–82,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. and Luke Trainor, ‘Historians as Imperialists — Some Roots of British Imperial History, 1880–1900’, New Zealand Journal of History, vol. 15/1 (April 1981) pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
  9. Richard White has provided a fascinating comparative perspective on nationalism in another ‘region of recent settlement’, in Inventing Australia: Images and Identity (Sydney, 1981) where he remarks that ‘We must remember that historians can be image-makers too’ (p. viii).Google Scholar
  10. 3.
    A. P. Thornton, Doctrines of Imperialism (New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  11. 4.
    An excellent comparative example is Carl C. Berger, ‘Race and Liberty: the Historical Ideals of Sir John George Bourinot’, The Canadian Historical Association Report, 1965, pp. 87–104. I thank him for sending me his paper.Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    Douglas Cole, ‘The Problem of “Nationalism” and “Imperialism” in British Settlement Colonies’, Journal of British Studies, X (1971) 160–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 6.
    T. R. H. Davenport, South Africa: a Modern History (London, 1977) p. xiii notes that ‘The study of South African history [was] so dependent in the early part of this century on the work of George McCall Theal…’. See also, Boeseken: ‘Theal as Baanbreker’, op. cit.Google Scholar
  14. 8.
    Louis Hartz, The Founding of New Societies (Yale, 1964);Google Scholar
  15. 9.
    Carl Berger, The Writing of Canadian history: Aspects of English-Canadian Historical Writing: 1900 to 1970 (Toronto, 1976) p. ix.Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    E. C. Wright, The Loyalists of New Brunswick (Federicton, 1955).Google Scholar
  17. 12.
    W. S. MacNutt, New Brunswick: a History, 1784–1867 (Toronto, 1963);Google Scholar
  18. J. Hanney History of New Brunswick, 2 vols (St. John, 1909);Google Scholar
  19. M. Whitelaw, The Maritimes and Canada before Confederation (Toronto; rep., 1966).Google Scholar
  20. For Saint John see the useful succint account by George Nader, Cities of Canada (Canada, 1976) II, pp.55–76.Google Scholar
  21. 13.
    See D. G. Creighton, The Road to Confederation: the emergence of Canada 1863–67 (Toronto, 1964);Google Scholar
  22. J. M. S. Careless, The Union of the Canadas: the Growth of Canadian Institutions (Toronto, 1968).Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    See C. W. de Kiewiet, The Imperial Factor (London, 1937);Google Scholar
  24. C. F. Goodfellow, Great Britain and South African Confederation, 1871–84, (Cape Town, 1961);Google Scholar
  25. T.R.H. Davenport, The Afrikaner Bond (Cape Town, 1966)Google Scholar
  26. and his South Africa: A Modern History (London, 1977) chs 6–9.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. M. Schreuder, Gladstone and Kruger: Liberal Government and Colonial ‘Home Rule’, 1880–83 (London, 1969).Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    D. M. Schreuder, The Scramble for Southern Africa: the Politics of Partition Reappraised, 1873–96 (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
  29. 86.
    J. A. La Nauze, ‘Who are the fathers?’ Historical Studies, XIII (1968).Google Scholar
  30. See also of course the definitive study by Professor La Nauze, The Making of the Australian constitution, (Melbourne, 1972).Google Scholar
  31. 91.
    W. M. Macmillan, Bantu, Boer and Briton (rev. ed, 1963);Google Scholar
  32. J. S. Galbraith has questioned the influence which Philip really had on policy in Reluctant Empire: British Policy on the South African Frontier, 1834–54 (California 1963).Google Scholar
  33. 104.
    J. S. Marais, Maynier and the First Boer Republic, (1944).Google Scholar
  34. See also, Herman Gilliomee, ‘Democracy and the Frontier,’ South African Historical Journal, 6 (1974) pp. 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 107.
    R. M. Crawford, ‘A bit of a Rebel’: the Life and Work of George Arnold Wood (Sydney, 1975).Google Scholar
  36. 108.
    James Barber, South Africa’s Foreign Policy, 1945–70 (Oxford, 1973), Part 3.Google Scholar
  37. 109.
    T. H. B. Miller, Survey of Commonwealth Affairs; Problem of Expansion and Attrition, 1953–69 (Oxford, 1974), pp. 126–66.Google Scholar
  38. 110.
    Richard Jebb, Studies in Colonial Nationalism (London, 1905).Google Scholar
  39. 111.
    G. M. Theal, Progress of South Africa in the Century (The 19th Century Series), (London, Edinburgh, Toronto and Philadelphia, 1902) p. 500.Google Scholar
  40. 113.
    G.M. Theal, South Africa: the Union of South Africa, Rhodesia and All Territories South of the Zambesi (8th ed, 11th impression, 1916) p. 418.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gordon Martel 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Schreuder

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations