Abstract
It should now be clear to the reader that the approach of Uno and Sekine is not simply one more contribution to the tradition of Marxian discourse, but instead constitutes a major reinterpretation. Political economy, dialectical materialism, historical materialism and their interrelations are understood differently from any of the perspectives that have been developed within Western Marxism. Furthermore, I have argued that the Unoist approach is superior to any that has been developed within the West not only in being more scientific but also in overcoming many of the unresolved oppositions and polarities that we find in the Western tradition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For a good discussion of the Gramscian elements in Poulantzas, see Robert Jessop, The Capitalist State (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1986 Robert Albritton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albritton, R. (1986). Conclusion. In: A Japanese Reconstruction of Marxist Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18162-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18162-9_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-39592-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18162-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)