Skip to main content
  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

It should now be clear to the reader that the approach of Uno and Sekine is not simply one more contribution to the tradition of Marxian discourse, but instead constitutes a major reinterpretation. Political economy, dialectical materialism, historical materialism and their interrelations are understood differently from any of the perspectives that have been developed within Western Marxism. Furthermore, I have argued that the Unoist approach is superior to any that has been developed within the West not only in being more scientific but also in overcoming many of the unresolved oppositions and polarities that we find in the Western tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a good discussion of the Gramscian elements in Poulantzas, see Robert Jessop, The Capitalist State (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Robert Albritton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albritton, R. (1986). Conclusion. In: A Japanese Reconstruction of Marxist Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18162-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics