Extending Free Trade to Include International Investment: a Welfare-Theoretic Analysis

  • Jagdish N. Bhagwati
  • Richard A. Brecher

Abstract

The classic gains-from-trade theorem of Samuelson (1939) demonstrates that voluntary trade between agents with given endowments must be mutually advantageous: strictly speaking, it cannot be harmful to any of the agents. This fundamental insight underlies institutions such as the GATT which oversee trade among nations. Recently, the United States has proposed that the GATT be extended to include freedom of private investment flows. This proposal presumes that, if free trade exists initially in goods, the subsequent introduction of free capital mobility must also be beneficial to all agents. However, this is simply not true.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhagwati, Jagdish N., ‘Immiserizing Growth: a Geometrical Note’, Review of Economic Studies, 25, pp. 201–5, June 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhagwati, J. N., ‘Distortions and Immiserizing Growth: A Generalisation’, Review of Economic Studies, 35, pp. 481–5, October 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhagwati, J. N., ‘The Theory of Immiserizing Growth: Further Applications’, in Michael B. Connolly and Alexander K. Swoboda (eds) International Trade and Money (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  4. Bhagwati, J. N., ‘Structural Adjustment and International Factor Mobility: Some Issues’, Paper No. 6, International Economics Research Center, Columbia University, mimeograph, August 1982.Google Scholar
  5. Bhagwati, J. N., and Richard A. Brecher, ‘National Welfare in an Open Economy in the Presence of Foreign-Owned Factors of Production’, Journal of International Economics, 10, pp. 103–15, February 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brecher, Richard A. and Ehsan U. Choudhri, ‘Immiserizing Investment from Abroad: The Singer-Prebisch Thesis Reconsidered’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, pp. 181–90, February 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brecher, R. A. and Carlos F. Diaz-Alejandro, ‘Tariffs, Foreign Capital and Immiserizing Growth’, Journal of International Economics, 7, pp. 317–22, November 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brecher, R. A. and Robert C. Feenstra, ‘International Trade and Capital Mobility between Diversified Economies’, Journal of International Economics, 14, pp. 321–39, May 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chipman, John S., ‘International Trade with Capital Mobility: A Substitution Theorem’, in Jagdish N. Bhagwati et al. (eds), Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth: Papers in International Economics in Honor of Charles P. Kindleberger (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1971).Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, Gene M., ‘The Gains from International Factor Movements’, Princeton University and Tel-Aviv University, mimeograph, November 1982 (revised August 1983); forthcoming in Journal of International Economics. Google Scholar
  11. Hamada, Koichi, ‘An Economic Analysis of the Duty-Free Zone’, Journal of International Economics, 4, pp. 225–41, August 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, Harry G., ‘The Possibility of Income Losses from Increased Efficiency or Factor Accumulation in the Presence of Tariffs’, Economic Journal, 77, pp. 151–4. March 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, Ronald W., ‘International Capital Movements and the Theory of Tariffs and Trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, pp. 1–38, February 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kemp, Murray C., ‘The Gain from International Trade and Investment: A Neo-Heckscher-Ohlin Approach’, American Economic Review, 56, pp. 788–809, September 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Minabe, Nobuo, ‘Capital and Technology Movements and Economic Welfare’, American Economic Review, 64, pp. 1088–100. December 1974.Google Scholar
  16. Samuelson, Paul A., ‘The Gains from International Trade’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 5, pp. 195–205, May 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singer, H.W., ‘The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 40, pp. 473–85, May 1950.Google Scholar
  18. Uekawa, Yasuo, ‘On the Existence of Incomplete Specialization in International Trade with Capital Mobility’, Journal of International Economics, 2, pp. 1–23, February 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Uzawa, H., ‘Shihon Jiyuka to Kokumin Keizai (Liberalisation of Foreign Investments and the National Economy)’, Economisuto, 23, pp. 106–22, December 1969 (in Japan).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sanjaya Lall and Frances Stewart 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jagdish N. Bhagwati
  • Richard A. Brecher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations