Skip to main content
  • 12 Accesses

Abstract

The first four chapters of this book have been occupied with an undecidability which affects what Saussure calls the signified, that is, the sense or meaning of a sign, what he earlier calls a concept. An undecidability which affects reference was explicitly touched on in the third section of Chapter 2. It is implicitly touched on however where meaning is under discussion, since understanding concepts is not separable from the ability to refer to cases instantiating them and one cannot refer to something except under some description, even if the description is no more than ‘what I am referring to’. ‘This is this’ makes no sense.1 Further, in the ‘Platonic’ theory of ideas to which are moored the phenomenological semiologies we have been considering so far, sense and reference are one.

Cite… [f. F citer f. L citare frequent. of ciēre set moving]

Concise Oxford Dictionary

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. L. Wittgenstein, The Blue and the Brown Books (Oxford: Blackwell, 1958) pp. 109, 117; cp. Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967) 38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. L. Austin, How to do things with Words (Oxford: Clarendon, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. John R. Searle, Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. John R. Searle, ‘Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida’, Glyph, 1 (1977) pp. 198–208.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961) 3.23; cp. Philosophical Investigations, 9, 27–30, 257.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Rhizomes (Paris: Minuit, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. John R. Searle, ‘The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse’, New Literary History, 5 (1975) p. 319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Translated from Nietzsche, Le Livre du philosophe (Paris: Aubier Flammarion, 1969) pp. 181–2, cited at M 258 (217).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dugald Stewart, Philosophical Essays (Edinburgh: Creech and Constable, 1810) p. 217,

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. cited by J. S. Mill, System of Logic (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1904) p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pierre Fontanier, Les Figures du discours (Paris: Flammarion, 1968) pp. 213–14, cited at M 305 (255).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plato, Sophist 241d–242a in F. M. Cornford, Plato’s Theory of Knowledge (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1935) pp. 214–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 John Llewelyn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Llewelyn, J. (1986). Rhetorological Semiology. In: Derrida on the Threshold of Sense. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18096-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics