Advertisement

Vertical Integration and Assurance of Markets

  • Jerry R. Green
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (volume 77)

Abstract

Four incentives for the vertical integration of firms have frequently been mentioned in the literature. Mergers may result from market power in either the primary-resource, intermediate-product or final- product markets.1 Technological advantages accruing to combination can arise through increasing returns,2 information advantages3 or decreased transactions costs, when firms place themselves in a cooperative rather than an adversarial relationship.4 Tax avoidance provides a third reason for integration.5 More generally, integration opens up a wider range of strategies in the face of regulation and more flexibility in implementing them. Finally, imperfections in the market for the intermediate product may lead firms to combine in order to bypass these problems by transferring goods internally.6 This chapter addresses the last of these issues. In particular, it studies the problem of price inflexibility in an intermediate-product market which is beset by stochastic demands, and the temporary shortages and gluts of this product that result. We hypothesise that firms choose to integrate if the expected profit from doing so exceeds that of the separate divisions acting independently. Both descriptive and normative conclusions regarding such an industry are drawn on the basis of the model presented.

Keywords

Intermediate Product Vertical Integration Expected Profit Excess Demand Profit Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, W. and Dirlam, J. B. (1964) ‘Steel Imports and Vertical Oligopoly Power’, American Economic Review, vol. 54, pp. 626–55.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, M. A. (1949) ‘Integration and Anti-trust Policy’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 63, pp. 27–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, B. T. (1971) ‘Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure: The Case of Cement and Concrete’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J. (1975) ‘Vertical Integration and Communication’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 6, pp. 173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R. and Grossman H. (1971) ‘A General Disequilibrium Model of Income and Employment’, American Economic Review, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 82–93.Google Scholar
  6. Benassy, J. P. (1982) The Economics of Market Disequilibrium, (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
  7. Benassy, J. P. (1978) ‘A Neo-Keynesian Model of Price and Quantity Determination in Disequilibrium’ in Equilibrium and Disequilibrium in Economic Theory, vol. 6.Google Scholar
  8. Bork, R. H. (1969) ‘Vertical Integration and Competitive Processes’, in Peltzman and Weston, (eds), Public Policy Towards Mergers, (Goodyear, Pacific Palisades, California) pp. 139–49.Google Scholar
  9. Clower, R. W. (1965) ‘The Keynesian Counterrevolution: A Theoretical Appraisal’, in Hahn, F. H. and Brechling, F. R. R. (eds), The Theory of Interest Rates, Proceedings of an IE A Conference, (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  10. Coase, R. H. (1937) ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, vol. 4, pp. 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crandell, R. (1968) ‘Vertical Integration and the Market for Repair Parts in the U.S. Automobile Industry’, Journal of Industrial Economics, pp. 212–34.Google Scholar
  12. Dayan, D. (1972) ‘Vertical Integration and Monopoly Regulation’, Princeton University dissertation.Google Scholar
  13. Dayan, D. (1972) ‘Vertical Integration and Monopoly Regulation’, Princeton University dissertation.Google Scholar
  14. Dennison, S. R. (1939) ‘Vertical Integration and the Iron and Steel Industry’, Economic Journal, pp. 244–58.Google Scholar
  15. Drfèze, J. (1975) ‘Existence of an Exchange Equilibrium under Price Rigidities’, International Economic Review, vol 16, pp. 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards, C. D. (1953) ‘Vertical Integration and the Monopoly Problem’, Journal of Marketing, no. 4, pp. 404–10.Google Scholar
  17. Foley, D. and Hellwig, M. (1973) ‘Asset Management with Trading Uncertainty’, MIT Working Paper no. 106.Google Scholar
  18. Frankel, P. H. (1953) ‘Integration in the Oil Industry’, Journal of Industrial Economics, pp. 202–11.Google Scholar
  19. Grandmont, J. M. and Laroque G. (1976) ‘On Temporary Keynesian Equilibria’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 43, pp. 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irwin, M. R. (1971) The Telecommunications Industry: Integration versus Competition,.Google Scholar
  21. Iwai, K. (1972) ‘Towards Keynesian Micro-Dynamics of Price, Wage, Sales and Employment’, University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper IP–174.Google Scholar
  22. Machlup, F. and Taber, M. (1960) ‘Bilateral Monopoly, Successive Monopoly and Vertical Integration’, Economica, new series, vol. 27, no. 106, pp. 101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malinvaud, E. (1976) The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered, (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  24. Malmgren, H. B. (1961) ‘Information, Expectations and the Theory of the Firm’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 339–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGee, J. S. (1960) ‘Conservation, Integration and Pricing in the Oil Industry of the U.S.: A Review Article’, Journal of Industrial Economics, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
  26. Mueller, W. E. (1969) ‘Public Policy Toward Vertical Mergers’, in Peltzman and Weston, (eds), Public Policy Towards Mergers, (Goodyear, Pacific Palisades, California) pp. 150–67.Google Scholar
  27. Peck, M. J. (1960) ‘Marginal Analysis and the Explanation of Business Behavior Under Uncertainty: a Case Study of the Output-Inventory Behavior in the Aluminum Industry’, in Expectations, Uncertainty and Business Behavior, ed. Bowman, M. J., Social Science Council, pp. 119–33.Google Scholar
  28. Peltzman, S. (1969) ‘Issues in Vertical Integration Policy’, in Peltzman and Weston, (eds), Public Policy Towards Mergers, (Goodyear, Pacific Palisades, California) pp. 167–79.Google Scholar
  29. Peltzman, S. and Weston, J. F., (eds), (1969) Public Policy Towards Mergers,(Goodyear, Pacific Palisades, California).Google Scholar
  30. Rothschild, M. (1969) Essays in Economic Theory, MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
  31. Schmalensee, R. (1973) ‘A Note on the Theory of Vertical Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 442–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, K.R. (1968) ‘Risk and the Optimal Utilization of Capital’, C.O.R.E. Discussion Paper no. 6818.Google Scholar
  33. Stigler, G. (1951) ‘The Division of Labor is Limited by the Size of the Market’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 59, pp. 185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. US Federal Trade Commission, Staff Report (1966) Economic Report of Mergers and Vertical Integration in the Cement Industry,.Google Scholar
  35. Vernon, J. M. and Graham, D. A. (1971) ‘Profitability of Monopolization by Vertical Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, pp. 924–5.Google Scholar
  36. Walters, A. A. (1960) ‘Marginal Productivity and Probability Distributions of Factor Services’, Economic Journal, vol. 70, pp. 325–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warren-Boulton, F. R. (1974) ‘Vertical Control, and Variable Proportions’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 783–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weitzman, M. (1974) ‘Prices versus Quantities’, Review of Economic Studies,, vol. 41, pp. 471–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitin, T. M. (1974) ‘The Marginalist Principle in Discrete Production: Comment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 139–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilk, D. (1968) ‘Vertical Integration in Cement Revisited’, Antitrust Bulletin, vol. 13, pp. 619–47.Google Scholar
  41. Williamson, O. E. (1971) ‘The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations’, American Economic Review, papers and proceedings, pp. 112–23.Google Scholar
  42. Wu, S. Y. (1964) ‘The Effects of Vertical Integration on Price and Output’, Western Economic Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–33.Google Scholar
  43. Younes, Y. (1975) ‘On the Role of Money in the Process of Exchange and the Existence of a Non-Walrasian Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 42, pp. 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zeeman, E.C. (1974) ‘On the Unstable Behavior of Stock Exchanges’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grossman, S. and Stiglitz, (1980) ‘The Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets’, American Economic Review, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
  46. Grossman, S. and Hart, O. (1981) ‘Implicit Contracts, Moral Hazard and Unemployment’, American Economic Review, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 301–307.Google Scholar
  47. Perry, M. (1981) ‘Vertical Equilibrium in a Competitive Input Market’, Bell Laboratories Economic Discussion Paper, no. 206.Google Scholar
  48. Salop, S. and Stiglitz, J. (1977) ‘Bargains and Ripoffs: a Model of Monopolis- tically Competitive Price Dispersion’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry R. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHarvard UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations