Abstract
From the first day of the one-year strike, television news was under attack. That day the miners’ president, Mr Arthur Scargill, accused BBC news and ITN of ‘distorted coverage’, and he kept up the barrage to the end. Yet he loved to appear on television himself, as the radio journalist Nicholas Jones soon noted, and he made astute use of his opportunities.1 He knew that television was his most effective way of reaching both the NUM membership and the public as a whole. His opponent, Mr Ian MacGregor, also complained of bias — against management — but shrugged it off as one of life’s inevitable injustices.2 Journalists found him a less adequate communicator, lacking the dexterity and appeal of Mr Scargill.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Nicholas Jones in The Listener 29 March 1984; also on Mr Scargill’s ‘calculated decision’ to attack the news media, The Listener 26 July 1984; and summing up on the importance of media presentation, The Listener 21 February 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1985 Alastair Hetherington
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hetherington, A. (1985). The 1984–5 Coal Dispute: Television News. In: News, Newspapers and Television. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18000-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18000-4_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-38606-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-18000-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)