Parliament and Non-Sovereign Law-Making Bodies
In my last chapter I dwelt upon the nature of Parliamentary sovereignty; my object in this chapter is to illustrate the characteristics of such sovereignty by comparing the essential features of a sovereign Parliament like that of England with the traits which mark non-sovereign law-making bodies.
KeywordsRailway Company Legislative Body Legislative Council Rigid Constitution Home Government
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.de Tocqueville, Euvres complètes (14th ed., 1864), vol. i (Démocratie en Amérique), pp. 166, 167.Google Scholar
- 1.See Bryce, Studies in History and Jurisprudence (1901), vol. i, Essay iii, Flexible and Rigid Constitutions.Google Scholar
- 2.See especially The Empress v. Burah and Book Singh (1877) 3 Ind. L.R. (Calcutta Series) 63, at pp. 86–89, per Markby, J.Google Scholar
- 1.Assuming, of course, that such Acts are not inconsistent with any imperial statute applying to the ceolony. Cf. Robinson v.Reynolda (1867) Macassey’s N.Z. Reports 562.Google Scholar
- 2.See Powell v. Apollo Candle Co. (1885) 10 App. Cas. 282, C.L.C. 67; Hodge v. The Queen (1883) 9 App. Cas. 117; cf. Intro. pp. lxxvi, ante.Google Scholar
- 1.For powers of constitutional amendment in New Zealand, see Wheare, The Statute of Westminster and Dominion Status (5th ed., 1953), pp. 227–235.Google Scholar
- 1.See Todd, Parliamentary Government in the British Colonies (2nd ed., 1894), ch. v.Google Scholar
- 1.Todd, Parliamentary Government in the British Colonies (2nd ed., 1894), p. 171. See Conference on Operation of Dominion Legislation, 1929 (Cmd. 3479, 1930), pp. 11–17. The Governor-General of Canada on the advice of the Dominion Cabinet disallowed certain Acts of the Legislature of Alberta in 1938.Google Scholar
- 1.de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (translation by H. Reeve, 1875), vol. ii, App. pp. 322, 323. Œuvres complètes (14th ed., 1864), vol. i (Démocratie en Amérique), p. 311.Google Scholar