Advertisement

The Sectoral Adjustment Implications of Current US Trends in Trade Competitiveness

  • Robert E. Baldwin
  • Stephen A. Parker
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

The general nature of the competitive position of the United States in world trade is well known. Analyses of world market shares of manufacturing exports have been made on a regular basis for the past 35 years, and reports over the past few years by the GATT, OECD and various individual scholars have clearly chronicled the deterioration in the competitive position of the USA. However, most studies have dealt with manufacturing as a whole or else divided manufactures into only a few broad product groups. Few have analysed the manufacturing sector in terms of detailed SIC or input-output sectors, or tried to relate detailed competitive shifts to changes in the employment of different types of labour. The result has been that while policy officials are well aware of the competitive problems of such industries as footwear, clothing, steel, colour TV and automobiles as well as the competitive gains by such sectors as computers and aircraft, they do not have a good picture of competitive trends in the many other industries making up the US manufacturing sector.

Keywords

Competitive Effect Income Elasticity Import Price Actual Growth Rate Tokyo Round 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, R. E., J. H. Mutti and J. D. Richardson(1980) ‘Welfare Effects on the United States of a Significant Multilateral Tariff Reduction’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 20., pp. 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, F. and J. Whalley (1980) ‘General Equilibrium Evaluations of Tariff-Cutting Proposals in the Tokyo Round and Comparisons with More Extensive Liberalization of World Trade’, Economic Journal, vol. 90, pp. 838–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deardorff, A. V. and R. M. Stern (1979) An Economic Analysis of the Effects of the Tokyo Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations on the United States and Other Major Industrial Countries, Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Subcommittee on International Trade (Washington: US Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
  4. Dixon, P. B., B. R. Parmenter, J. M. Sutton and D. P. Vincent (1982) ORANI: A Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company).Google Scholar
  5. Richardson, J. D. (1972) The Response of Imports and Domestic Demand to Price, Tariff, and Exchange Rate Changes: A Structural Study for Selected U.S. Manufactures, University of Wisconsin, Department of Economics (mimeo).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Baldwin
    • 1
  • Stephen A. Parker
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations