Advertisement

The State and Fertility Motivation in Singapore and China

  • Janet W. Salaff

Abstract

Unprecedentedly rapid population growth rates in developing nations threaten to derail programmes to industrialise. The first industial nations had developed in the absence of massive public health measures. Death rates were high and the great cities did not reproduce themselves. In contrast, today the new nations have sewage systems, clean water, improved transportation systems to move food and end famines quickly, and prophylactic drugs to head off major epidemic diseases. These environmental sanitation and public health measures reduce death rates in the developing nations below those of the now industrialised nations in an earlier era.1 Families in the early stages of development view children as productive assets. In agrarian and early industrial settings the household exercises autonomy and control over its labour. In labour-intensive agricultural settings small children can play a productive role.2 Even in newly-industrialising cities the lack of a ‘living wage’ for adults requires family members to combine their incomes.3 In both settings youngsters provide help around the home and will later give support to their elders.

Keywords

Family Size Population Policy Family Policy Crude Birth Rate High Order Birth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    Rene Dubois, The Mirage of Health (New York: Doubleday Anchors, 1961); Kingsley Davis, ‘The Urbanisation of the Human Population’, Scientific American, 213 (September 1965) 40–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Mamdani, The Myth of Population Control (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972); H. Leibenstein, Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth (New York: Wiley, 1957) 147–75.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jane Humphries, ‘Class Struggle and the Persistence of the Working-class Family’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1977, 1, 241–58.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henry P. David, ‘Incentives, Reproductive Behaviour, and Integrated Community Development in Asia’, Studies in Family Planning, 13, no. 5, May 1982, 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ansley J. Coale, ‘Population Trends, Population Policy and Population Studies in China’, Population and Development Review, 7, no. 1, March 1981, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    Pi-chao Chen, and A. Kols, ‘Population and Birth Planning in the People’s Republic of China’, Population Report, no. 25, X, J-577–J-618; Pi-chao Chen, ‘China’s Birth Planning Program’, in R. J. Lapham and R. A. Bulatao (eds) Research on the Population of China: Proceedings of a Workshop (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1981) 78–90; Victor Nee, ‘Post- Mao Changes in a South China Production Brigade’, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 11, 1979, 51–63; The Population Research Office, Anhui University, ‘A Survey of One-Child Families in Anhui Province, China’, Studies in Family Planning, 13, 1982, 216–21.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Elisabeth J. Croll, ‘Production Versus Reproduction: A Threat to China’s Development Strategy’, World Development, 11, no. 6, 1983, 467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.
    Cf. the county studied by Norma Diamond, ‘Model Villages and Village Realities’, Modern China, 9, no. 2, April, 1983, 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 10.
    W. H. Wu, et al., ‘How Do Peasants View the Idea of a Married Couple Having Only One Child? — A Survey Done in Dayi County, Sichuan Province’, Renkou Yanjiu, 4, 1981, 45–6.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Ministry of Health, Population and Trends (Singapore: author, 1988) 11; Economic Statistics of Singapore, 1980, 43; Chen-tung Chang, Fertility Transition in Singapore (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1974) 4, 20.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Peter S. J. Chen and James T. Fawcett (eds) Public Policy and Population Change in Singapore (New York: Population Council, 1979).Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    See William Ryan, Blaming the Victim (New York: Vintage, 1976); Cominos, ‘Late Victorian Respectability’.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    We distinguish between the short- and long-term economic costs of children. Short-term costs refer to immediate costs of feeding, clothing and housing children. Historically, short-term costs increased in the West when family labour could not be productively employed on behalf of the household, and goods and services were purchased in the market in lieu of exchanging them between families. Peter H. Lindert, Fertility and Scarcity in America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Nancy E. Williamson, Sons or Daughters (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1976).Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Lack of a long-term career ladder leads men to stress luck in their work lives, and they will often chance sexual relations without expecting a birth, or a birth hoping for a child of the right sex. Lee Rainwater, Family Design: Marital Sexuality, Family Size and Contraception (Chicago: Aldine, 1965); Janet Askham, Fertility and Deprivation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    Judith Blake, ‘Family Size and the Quality of Children’, Demography, 18, no. 4, November 1981, 421–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Elisabeth Croll, Delia Davin and Penny Kane 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet W. Salaff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations