Skip to main content

Knee-Capping Local Government

  • Chapter
Book cover The Politics of Local Expenditure

Part of the book series: Public Policy and Politics

Abstract

This final chapter will consider the current state of local finances, concentrating particularly on the topical and highly controversial question of recent government policy. The government has introduced some wide-reaching legislation in the last few years, with still more to come, and in this rapidly changing situation it is not possible to provide a completely up-to-date account of the system. It is also difficult to take a detached view of the particularly heated battle which envelops local government at present. Nevertheless most writers agree that the policies and practices of the Conservative governments elected in 1979 and 1983 introduce profound questions for the future of local democracy in Britain, so some attempt at an assessment of the present state of affairs should be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For a fuller discussion of cash limits see N.P. Hepworth, The Finance of Local Government, revised 5th edn (London: Allen & Unwin, 1979), 41–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See especially W.A. Robson, Local Government in Crisis, 2nd revised edn (London: Allen & Unwin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance (Layfield Committee), Cmnd 6453 (London: HMSO, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. On this development see H. Wolman, ‘Understanding local government responses to fiscal pressure: a cross national analysis’, Journal of Public Policy, III, 3 (August 1983), 245–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Greenwood, ‘Fiscal pressure and local government in England and Wales’, in C. Hood and M. Wright (eds), Big Government in Hard Times (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981), 85–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Self, ‘Rescuing local government’, The Political Quarterly, 53 (July–September 1982), 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. For a detailed discussion of the metropolitan counties see S. Bristow, D. Kermode and M. Mannin (eds), The Redundant Counties? (Ormskirk, Lancs: G.W. and A. Hesketh, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. For an account of both financial and non-financial changes see M. Goldsmith and K. Newton, ‘Central-Local Government relations: the irresistible rise of centralised power’, in H. Berrington (ed.), Changes in British Politics (London: Frank Cass, 1984), 216–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See R.A.W. Rhodes, ‘Continuity and change in British central-local relations: “The Conservative threat”, 1979–1983’, British Journal of Political Science, 14 (April 1984), 273–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. See, for example, A. Midwinter, M. Keating and P. Taylor, ‘Excessive and unreasonable: the politics of the Scottish hit lists’, Political Studies, 31 (September 1983), 394–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Jones and J. Stewart, The Case for Local Government (London: Allen & Unwin, 1983), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Pauley, Financial Times (4 August 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Travers, ‘The block grant and the recent development of the grant system’, Local Government Studies, 8 (May/June 1982), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. For figures and a discussion of local government spending, 1972–83, see R.A.W. Rhodes, The National World of Local Government (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985), ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Gretton and P. Gilder, ‘Local authority budgets 1982: responding to incentives’, Public Money, 2 (December 1982), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Dunleavy and R.A.W. Rhodes, ‘Beyond Whitehall’, in H. Drucker et al. (eds), Developments in British Politics (London: Macmillan, 1984), 128.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, for example, A. Midwinter, M. Keating and P. Taylor, ‘Current expenditure guidelines in Scotland: a failure of indicative planning’, Local Government Studies, 10 (March/April 1984), 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Travers, ‘Opposite effect’, Public Money, 1 (May 1982), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Gibson, ‘Local “Overspending”: Why the Government have only themselves to blame’, Public Money, 3 (December 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Jackman, The Rates Bill: A measure of desperation’, The Political Quarterly, 55 (April–June 1984), 169–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N.P. Hepworth, The Finance of Local Government (London: Allen & Unwin, 1972), 83.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L.J. Sharpe and K. Newton, Does Politics Matter? The Determinants of Public Policy (Oxford University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coopers and Lybrand Associates, Streamlining the Cities (London: Coopers and Lybrand Associates, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance (Layfield Committee), Cmnd 6453 (London: HMSO, 1976), 56–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, for example, J. Knott, ‘Stabilization policy, grants-in-aid, and the federal system in Western Germany’, in W.E. Oates (ed.), The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington, 1977), 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Jackman, ‘Does central government need to control the total of local government spending?’, Local Government Studies, 8 (May/June 1982), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P.M. Jackson, ‘The impact of economic theories on local government finance’, Local Government Studies, 8 (January/February 1982), 31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G.A. Almond and S.S. Verba, The Civic Culture (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1965), 141

    Google Scholar 

  29. Commission of the Constitution, Research Paper no. 7, Devolution and other Aspects of Government: An Attitudes Survey (London: HMSO, 1973), 6

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Weir, ‘The citizen and the town hall’, New Society, 9 (March 1982), 346.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Jowell and C. Airey (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 1984 Report (London: Gower and Social and Community Planning Research, 1984), 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  32. C. Game, ‘Axeman or Taxman — who is now the more unpopular?’, Local Government Studies, 10 (January/February 1984), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Rose, Getting by in three economies: The resources of the official, unofficial and domestic economies, Studies in Public Policy, no. 110 (Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Centre for the Study of Public Policy, 1983), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Edgell and V. Duke, ‘Public expenditure cuts in Britain and consumption sectoral cleavages’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, VIII, 2 (1984), 177–201

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. Heiser, ‘Testing public attitudes’, Municipal Review, 645 (April 1984), 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Hockley and G. Harbour, ‘People’s choice: public spending, taxation and local rates’, Public Money, 1 (March 1982), 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  37. P. Beedle and P. Taylor-Gooby, ‘Ambivalence and Altruism: Public opinion about taxation and welfare’, Policy and Politics, 11 (January 1983), 15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R.M. Coughlin, Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy (Berkeley, Ca: Institute of International Studies, 1980), 129–54.

    Google Scholar 

  39. D.E. Ashford, ‘A Victorian drama: The fiscal subordination of local government’, in D.E. Ashford (ed.), Financing Urban Government in the Welfare State (London: Croom Helm, 1980), 71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 K. Newton and T. J. Karran

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newton, K., Karran, T.J. (1985). Knee-Capping Local Government. In: The Politics of Local Expenditure. Public Policy and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17849-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics