The Sociology of Attitude Change

  • Terence H. Qualter


In contrast to psychology, which concentrates on attributes of the individual mind and personality, sociological analysis looks at man in his social setting, arguing that attitudes ‘are shaped by the cultural traditions, social institutions, and group norms of the society in which every individual finds himself’.1 Sociologists draw on the considerable evidence that individuals acquire many of their attitudes and values ready-made from the groups to which they belong. Individual psychological factors may modify or refine these socially acquired attitudes, but the social setting narrows the effective choices which individuals may make. Not all possible courses of action can ever be considered. In any society there will be certain responses accepted as so natural as to be beyond debate, and certain others so unnatural as to be unworthy of serious attention. Thus while the psychologists have been preoccupied with how the individual mind and nervous system respond to stimuli, the sociologists have been more concerned with how the society itself, or organisations within it, and the constraints of class, race, citizenship, religion, profession, etc., limit the range of stimuli and prescribe the possible responses that may be made to them.


Social Setting Liberal Democracy Opinion Control Adult Behaviour Behavioural Norm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 15.
    Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, ‘Public Opinion and the Classical Tradition: A Re-evaluation’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 1979, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 16.
    H. C. Kelman, ‘Process of Opinion Change’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 1961, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 26.
    F. I. Greenstein, ‘Political Socialization’, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 14, 1968, 551.Google Scholar
  4. 28.
    Roberta Sigel, ‘Assumptions About the Learning of Political Values’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 361, 1965, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 32.
    D. A. Saunders, ‘Social Ideas in McGuffey Readers’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 5, 1941, 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 42.
    D. D. Searing et al., ‘The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems’, American Political Science Review, 67, 1973, 415–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. David Marsh, ‘Political Socialization: The Implicit Assumptions Questioned’, British Journal of Political Science, 1, 1971, 454–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 46.
    R. E. Lane, ‘Fathers and Sons: Foundations of Political Belief, American Sociological Review, 24, 1959, 502–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 47.
    R. W. Connell, ‘Political Socialization in the American Family: the Evidence Re-examined’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 1972, 323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 54.
    Edgar Litt, ‘Civic Education, Community Norms, and Political Indoctrination’, American Sociological Review, 28, 1963, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 57.
    J. D. Halloran, Attitude Formation and Change, 1967, 41. Note also I. D. Steiner, ‘Primary Group Influences on Public Opinion’, American Sociological Review, 19, 1954, 260–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 65.
    S. H. Chaffee et al., ‘Mass Communication and Political Socialization’, Journalism Quarterly, 47, 1970, 647–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Terence H. Qualter 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence H. Qualter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations