Advertisement

Gladstone and Manning: a Question of Authority

  • V. Alan McClelland

Abstract

Fifty years ago, in commemoration of the centenary of the Oxford Movement, the then Archbishop of Canterbury, Cosmo Lang, delivered the Founder’s Day Address at St Deiniol’s Library and took as his subject ‘Mr Gladstone and the Oxford Movement’.1 It is perhaps not inappropriate, therefore, as in 1983 we remember the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of John Keble’s sermon on ‘National Apostacy’,2 that we should return to a consideration of what Gladstone was to call that ‘great renovating movement’3 and, in particular, examine some of the ‘vicissitudes’,4 as he termed them, in his relationship with Manning arising out of the questions it posed. To encompass such a vast endeavour in its varied nuances would, of course, be an unrealistic venture for an occasion such as this is. Lord Rosebery once remarked that a limited liability company would be necessary to write a biography of Gladstone, and to write a history of his religious opinions alone would need a more detailed sympathy than any one man could supply. In a similar vein, Wilfrid Meynell records that Manning estimated it would necessitate three men to write his own life satisfactorily in its three great phases — Anglican, Roman Catholic and Civic.5

Keywords

Limited Liability Company Liberal Party Civil Allegiance Religious Opinion Fiftieth Anniversary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    Gladstone, A Chapter of Autobiography (1868) p. 52.Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    P. Butler, Gladstone: Church, State and Tractarianism. A Study of his Religious Ideas and Attitudes, 1809–1859 (Oxford University Press, 1982 ) p. 199.Google Scholar
  3. 10.
    A. R. Vidler, The Orb and the Cross: A Normative Study in the Relations of Church and State with Reference to Gladstone’s Early Writings (London: SPCK, 1945) pp.27–8Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    W. E. Gladstone, The State in Its Relations with the Church, 4th edn (1841) vol. II, pp. 360 – 1.Google Scholar
  5. 17.
    T. B. Macaulay, ‘Gladstone on Church and State’, reprinted in his Critical and Historical Essays (1909) p. 271.Google Scholar
  6. 20.
    S. Liberty, ‘Mr Gladstone’s Place in Religious Thought’, Nineteenth Century (October 1907) p. 658.Google Scholar
  7. 26.
    W. E. Gladstone, Church Principles Considered in Their Results (1840) p. 504Google Scholar
  8. E. T. Feuchtwanger, Gladstone (London: Allan Lane, 1975) pp. 33 et seq.Google Scholar
  9. 30.
    R. D. Hampden, A Lecture on Tradition read before the Universiy in the Divinity School, Oxford, on Thursday March 7, 1839 5th edn (1839) p. 75.Google Scholar
  10. 31.
    N. Wiseman, Lectures on the Principal Doctrines and Practices of the Catholic Church, 1867 edn, Preface to the 1st edn, p. iii (1836) p. 62.Google Scholar
  11. 32.
    H. E. Manning, The Principle of the Ecclesiastical Commission Examined in a Letter to the Right Rev. The Lord Bishop of Chichester (1838) p. 10.Google Scholar
  12. 36.
    H. E. Manning, The Rule of Faith: A Sermon preached in the Cathedral Church of Chichester, June 13, 1838, at the Primary Visitation of the Rt. Rev. William Otter, Lord Bishop of Chichester, 2nd edn (1839) p. 45.Google Scholar
  13. 38.
    J. H. Newman, Apologia Pro Vita Sua (1864) p. 212.Google Scholar
  14. 40.
    H. E. Manning, The Unity of the Church (1842).Google Scholar
  15. 41.
    H. E. Manning, The Eternal Priesthood (1883).Google Scholar
  16. 45.
    H. E. Manning, The Appellate Jurisdiction of the Crown in Matters Spiritual: A Letter to the Right Reverend Ashurst-Turner, Lord Bishop of Chichester(1850) p. 4.Google Scholar
  17. 54.
    J. E. C. Bodley, Cardinal Manning and Other Essays (1912) p. 16.Google Scholar
  18. 56.
    D. C. Lathbury (ed), Correspondence on Church and Religion of William Ewart Gladstone (1910) vol. i, p. 358.Google Scholar
  19. 57.
    H. C. G. Matthew, ‘Gladstone, Vaticanism, and the Question of the East’ in Derek Baker (ed), Studies in Church History ( Oxford: Blackwell, 1978 ) vol. 15, P. 441.Google Scholar
  20. H. E. Manning, Why I Became a Catholic or, Religio Viatoris, 4th edn (1887) pp. 64, 67.Google Scholar
  21. 68.
    V. A. McClelland, Cardinal Manning: His Public Life and Influence, 1865–1892 (Oxford University Press, 1962) pp. 69 et seq.Google Scholar
  22. 69.
    C. S. Dessain and T. Gornall, The Letters and Diaries of John Henry.Newman (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975) vol. XXVII, letter of 6 October 1874, Newman to Alfred Plummer.Google Scholar
  23. 70.
    D. McElrath, The Syllabus of Pius IX: Some Reactions in England (London: 1964) p. 316. Letter quoted of Gladstone to Döllinger, dated 7 March 1875.Google Scholar
  24. 76.
    Cuthbert Butler, The Vatican Council (1930) vol. i, p. 16.Google Scholar
  25. 77.
    N. Blakiston (ed), The Roman Question: Extractsfrom the Despatches of Odo Russell from Rome, 1858–1870 (London: Chapman & Hall, 1972) letter of 18 June 1870 from Russell to Clarendon.Google Scholar
  26. 83.
    E. R. Norman, Anti-Catholicism in Victorian England (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1968 ) pp. 94, 95.Google Scholar
  27. 86.
    T. Capel, A Reply to the Rt. Hon. W. E. Gladstone’s ‘Political Expostulations’ (1874) P. 24.Google Scholar
  28. 89.
    W. E. Gladstone, Vaticanism: An Answer to Replies and Reproofs(1875) p. 113.Google Scholar
  29. 90.
    W. B. Ullathorne, The Döllingerites, Mr Gladstone and Apostates from the Faith. A Letter to the Catholics of his Diocese (1874) p. 18.Google Scholar
  30. 98.
    H. E. Manning, The True Story of the Vatican Council, 2nd edn (1877) p. 201. He declared: ‘Modern Liberalism is the Caesarism of the State’ (p. 201).Google Scholar
  31. 99.
    V. A. McClelland, ‘The “Free Schools” Issue and the General Election of 1885: A Denominational Response’, History of Education, vol. 5, no. 2 (1976) pp. 141–54. Manning’s article was published as a pamphlet by Donovan, London, in October 1885. It ran to fourteen pages and was widely distributed.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter J. Jagger 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Alan McClelland

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations