Abstract
The close timing of the American Equal Pay Act (1963) and Civil Rights Act (1964) on the one hand and the British Equal Pay Act (1970) and Sex Discrimination Act (1975) on the other and the economic analyses discussed in the last chapter suggest that equal pay and opportunity laws may be seen as complementary. To some extent this is true. The latter laws, in principle, prevent evasions of the former. But the history both of pressure for change and of willingness by governments to respond suggest that the issues are distinct, especially in Britain. Demands for public enquiries into equal pay had appeared since the nineteenth century. But widespread pressure for an anti-discrimination law did not ‘take off’ until after the Equal Pay Act. And in any case, although this book is about employment only, employment is but one of several aspects of economic and social life covered by The Sex Discrimination Act. In the United States, although public responses clearly distinguish between equal pay and equal opportunities, early feminism showed a much greater integration of political, social and economic demands than in Britain. In both countries, something of a hiatus occurred in the inter-war period. After 1945 pressure for an equal rights amendment gained some momentum in the United States.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
End-notes
The main sources of information for this section are: O. Banks, Faces of Feminism (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981).
S. Bruley, Women’s Organisations in the UK: A Short History (London: National Council of Voluntary Organisations, 1980).
E. Cary and K. W. Peratis, Women and the Law (New York: National Text Book Co./ACLU, 1977).
W. H. Chafe, Women and Equality: Changing Values in American Culture (Oxford: University Press, 1977).
W. O’Neill, The Woman Movement: Feminism in the United States and England (London: Allen & Unwin, 1969).
J. O’Sullivan and R. Gallick, Workers and Allies: Female Participation on the American Trade Union Movement 1824–1976 (Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1976).
V. Randall, Women and Politics (London: Macmillan, 1982).
A. Sachs and J. H. Wilson, Sexism and the Law (London: Martin Robertson, 1978).
Thelma Hunter, Manchester Guardian, 22 March 1957.
Lady Pakenham, Spectator, 16 January 1953.
Mr Justice Denning, The Times, 13 May 1950.
J. Bowlby, Child Care and the Growth of Love (London: Penguin, 1953), in which he linked mental retardation with maternal deprivation.
This is compatible with the view of political sociologists that any social failure in the United States is personalised instead of seen as a consequence of exogenous arrangements over which the individual has little control. See S. M. Lipset, The First New Nation (New York: Basic Books Inc., 1963) pp. 268–73.
B. Friedan, The Feminine Mystique (London: Penguin, 1963) ch. 1.
One of the first was by S. Finer, Anonymous Empire (London: Pall Mall, 1966).
J. Jeffreys, The Story of the Engineers (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1946) pp. 56–7.
A. Potter, ‘The Equal Pay Campaign Committee: A Case Study of a Pressure Group’, Political Studies, vol. 5, no. 1 (February 1957). Trades Union Congress Women’s Conference Reports.
J. Morton, New Society, 8 August 1968.
M. Allen, The Times, 6 November 1968.
M. Snell, ‘The Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Acts: Their Impact in the Work Place’, Feminist Review, no. 1 (1979).
Page Smith, cited by J. Elshtain, ‘Moral Woman and Immoral Man: A Consideration of the Public-Private Split and its Political Ramifications’, Politics and Society, 1974, p. 460.
P. Richards, Parliament and Conscience (London: Allen & Unwin, 1971) p. 205.
J. Barr, New Society, 17 December 1964.
C. Callender, ‘The Development of the Sex Discrimination Act, 1971–75’, dissertation, University of Bristol, 1978.
A. Coote and P. Hewitt, in P. Moss and N. Fonda (eds), Work and the Family (London: Temple Smith, 1980).
These aims were given weight by the Reith Lecturer, Professor Carstairs, in the winter of 1962–3. His argument about women in British society was that their supposed equality had little reality. The Sunday Times, 21 January 1963.
S. Delaney, The Sunday Times, 16 December 1962.
R. Stone, Daily Worker, 12 March 1964.
For example, J. Tweedie, Guardian, 13 March 1972.
Callender, ‘The Development of the Sex Discrimination Act, 1971–75’, p. 32.
R. Crossman, Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, vol. III (London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape, 1977) pp. 27, 790.
S. Rowbotham, ‘The Beginnings of Women’s Liberation in Britain’, in M. Wandor (ed.), The Body Politic (London: Stage 1, 1972) p. 96.
J. Freeman, The Politics of Women’s Liberation (New York: David McKay & Co., 1975) pp. 59–61.
Copyright information
© 1985 Elizabeth Meehan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meehan, E.M. (1985). The Politics of Pressure for Reform. In: Women’s Rights at Work. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17735-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17735-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-36126-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17735-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)