Skip to main content

The Politics of Pressure for Reform

  • Chapter
Women’s Rights at Work
  • 4 Accesses

Abstract

The close timing of the American Equal Pay Act (1963) and Civil Rights Act (1964) on the one hand and the British Equal Pay Act (1970) and Sex Discrimination Act (1975) on the other and the economic analyses discussed in the last chapter suggest that equal pay and opportunity laws may be seen as complementary. To some extent this is true. The latter laws, in principle, prevent evasions of the former. But the history both of pressure for change and of willingness by governments to respond suggest that the issues are distinct, especially in Britain. Demands for public enquiries into equal pay had appeared since the nineteenth century. But widespread pressure for an anti-discrimination law did not ‘take off’ until after the Equal Pay Act. And in any case, although this book is about employment only, employment is but one of several aspects of economic and social life covered by The Sex Discrimination Act. In the United States, although public responses clearly distinguish between equal pay and equal opportunities, early feminism showed a much greater integration of political, social and economic demands than in Britain. In both countries, something of a hiatus occurred in the inter-war period. After 1945 pressure for an equal rights amendment gained some momentum in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

End-notes

  1. The main sources of information for this section are: O. Banks, Faces of Feminism (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Bruley, Women’s Organisations in the UK: A Short History (London: National Council of Voluntary Organisations, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Cary and K. W. Peratis, Women and the Law (New York: National Text Book Co./ACLU, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. H. Chafe, Women and Equality: Changing Values in American Culture (Oxford: University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. O’Neill, The Woman Movement: Feminism in the United States and England (London: Allen & Unwin, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. O’Sullivan and R. Gallick, Workers and Allies: Female Participation on the American Trade Union Movement 1824–1976 (Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. Randall, Women and Politics (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Sachs and J. H. Wilson, Sexism and the Law (London: Martin Robertson, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thelma Hunter, Manchester Guardian, 22 March 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lady Pakenham, Spectator, 16 January 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mr Justice Denning, The Times, 13 May 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Bowlby, Child Care and the Growth of Love (London: Penguin, 1953), in which he linked mental retardation with maternal deprivation.

    Google Scholar 

  13. This is compatible with the view of political sociologists that any social failure in the United States is personalised instead of seen as a consequence of exogenous arrangements over which the individual has little control. See S. M. Lipset, The First New Nation (New York: Basic Books Inc., 1963) pp. 268–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Friedan, The Feminine Mystique (London: Penguin, 1963) ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. One of the first was by S. Finer, Anonymous Empire (London: Pall Mall, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Jeffreys, The Story of the Engineers (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1946) pp. 56–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Potter, ‘The Equal Pay Campaign Committee: A Case Study of a Pressure Group’, Political Studies, vol. 5, no. 1 (February 1957). Trades Union Congress Women’s Conference Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Morton, New Society, 8 August 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Allen, The Times, 6 November 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Snell, ‘The Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Acts: Their Impact in the Work Place’, Feminist Review, no. 1 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Page Smith, cited by J. Elshtain, ‘Moral Woman and Immoral Man: A Consideration of the Public-Private Split and its Political Ramifications’, Politics and Society, 1974, p. 460.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Richards, Parliament and Conscience (London: Allen & Unwin, 1971) p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Barr, New Society, 17 December 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Callender, ‘The Development of the Sex Discrimination Act, 1971–75’, dissertation, University of Bristol, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Coote and P. Hewitt, in P. Moss and N. Fonda (eds), Work and the Family (London: Temple Smith, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  26. These aims were given weight by the Reith Lecturer, Professor Carstairs, in the winter of 1962–3. His argument about women in British society was that their supposed equality had little reality. The Sunday Times, 21 January 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Delaney, The Sunday Times, 16 December 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Stone, Daily Worker, 12 March 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For example, J. Tweedie, Guardian, 13 March 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Callender, ‘The Development of the Sex Discrimination Act, 1971–75’, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Crossman, Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, vol. III (London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape, 1977) pp. 27, 790.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Rowbotham, ‘The Beginnings of Women’s Liberation in Britain’, in M. Wandor (ed.), The Body Politic (London: Stage 1, 1972) p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Freeman, The Politics of Women’s Liberation (New York: David McKay & Co., 1975) pp. 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Elizabeth Meehan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meehan, E.M. (1985). The Politics of Pressure for Reform. In: Women’s Rights at Work. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17735-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics