Abstract
For more than 50 years obstetricians have given a lead in demonstrating their concern for prevention by stressing the importance of good antenatal care. A primary objective of these antenatal programmes has been to achieve an optimal level of maternal and infant health, by early identification of any complications such as toxaemia or fetal growth retardation, and to anticipate potential problems associated with the delivery itself. However, these clinical objectives were not originally seen as the only—or even the main—reason for developing universal antenatal care. The obstetrician Ballantyne, who did so much to develop the concept of antenatal surveillance at the turn of the century, always taught that ‘the first objective of those caring for pregnant and childbearing women is the removal of anxiety and dread’. The removal of such anxiety depends on providing knowledge and information to counter the fear of the unknown, and on building up a sense of shared commitment and trust between the provider and the receiver of care without which childbirth would remain a very lonely ordeal. How far we have progressed along the road to achieving this ideal is a question we would do well to consider. Pregnancy is undoubtedly safer than it was 50 years ago, but we should not lightly assume that the fear of pregnancy and childbirth has fallen to a comparable degree.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Anderson, D. C., Fowler, H. K., Perkins, E. R. and Spencer, N. J. (1980). Practical Prospects for Health Education in the 1980’s. A Report of the Leverhulme Health Education Project, University of Nottingham
Boyd, C. and Sellers, L. (1982). The British Way of Birth, Pan Books, London
Cartwright, A. (1979). The Dignity of Labour? A Study of Childbearing and Induction, Tavistock, London
Chamberlain, G. (1980). The prepregnancy clinic. Br. Med. J., 281, 29–30
Chamberlain, G., Phillip, E., Howlett, B. and Masters, K. (1978). British Births 1970, Vol. 2, Heinemann Medical, London
Committee on the Child Health Services (1976). Fit for the Future, HMSO, London
House of Commons Social Services Committee (1980). Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality, Vol. 1, Chapter 21, HMSO, London
Marsh, G. N. (1977). Obstetric audit in general practice. Br. Med. J. ii, 1004–1006
Pearse, I. H. and Crocker, L. H. (1943). The Peckham Experiment. A Study in the Living Structure of Society, Allen and Unwin, London
Perkins, E. R. (1980). Education for Childbirth and Parenthood, Chapter 4, Croom Helm, London
Prince, J. and Adams, M. E. (1978). Minds, Mothers and Midwives. The Psychology of Childbirth, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Pringle, M. K. (1975). The Needs of Children, Hutchinson, London
Taylor, G. H., Edgar, W., Taylor, B. A. and Neal, D. G. (1980). How safe is general practitioner obstetrics? Lancet, ii, 1287–1289
Williams, M. and Booth, D. (1980). Antenatal Education. Guidelines for Teachers, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1984 The Royal Society of Medicine
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hey, E. (1984). A Medical View. In: Zander, L., Chamberlain, G. (eds) Pregnancy Care for the 1980s. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17389-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17389-1_21
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-33346-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17389-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)