Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Language, Discourse, Society ((LDS))

  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

We have been reading the wrong Freud to children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For more explicitly psychoanalytic discussions ofPeter Pan see John Skinner, ‘James M. Barrie or The Boy Who Wouldn’t Grow Up’ (Skinner, 1957), Martin Grotjahn, ‘The Defenses Against Creative Anxiety in the Life and Work of James Barrie’ (a commentary on John Skinner’s article) (Grotjahn, 1957), and G. H. Pollock, ‘On Siblings, Childhood Sibling Loss and Creativity’ (Pollock, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Jacqueline Rose

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, J. (1984). Peter Pan and Freud. In: The Case of Peter Pan or The Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17385-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics