The opposition between saying and not-saying which I have described in the work of some American poets seems to me an equally prominent feature of the recent history of English and Irish poetry. The pathos of subjectivity, the ‘responsibility to say what one feels about things’: these imperatives have come and gone on this side of the Atlantic as well as on the other. My next chapter will deal with their coming at a particular moment in the careers of Philip Larkin and Seamus Heaney, the one after that with their going at a particular moment in the careers of Ted Hughes, Geoffrey Hill and J. H. Prynne.
KeywordsDust Coherence Beach Silt Defend
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Philip Larkin, ‘A Voice for Our Time’, Observer (16 December 1969) p.35.Google Scholar
- Anthony Sampson, Anatomy of Britain Today second edition (1965) pp.668, 669, 91, 617. Wilson’s remark about the language of the technical age is quoted on p.94.Google Scholar
- Peter Richards, Parliament and Conscience (1970) p.19.Google Scholar
- Quoted by David McKie, ‘The Quality of Life’, in McKie and Chris Cook (eds.), The Decade of Disillusion: British Politics in the Sixties (1972) p. 201.Google Scholar
- Christopher Ricks, ‘The Mount, the Meal and the Book’, London Review of Books (8 November 1979) p.4.Google Scholar
- Seamus Heaney, ‘Feeling into Words’, in Preoccupations. Selected Prose 1968–1978, (1980) pp.56–7.Google Scholar
- Seamus Heaney, Viewpoints p.70.Google Scholar
- Blake Morrison, ‘Speech and Reticence’ pp.110, 107.Google Scholar
- Seamus Heaney, ‘1972’, Preoccupations p.34.Google Scholar
- Karl Miller, ‘Opinion’, The Review, 27–8 (1971–2) pp. 48–51.Google Scholar
- Seamus Heaney, Viewpoints p.61.Google Scholar
- Seamus Heaney, ‘The Makings of a Music’, Preoccupations p.61.Google Scholar