Skip to main content
  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

It is a central theme of this book that an essential ingredient of sustained development and progress in peasant agriculture is its operation within a free enterprise economy — certainly as far as production and, in most cases, marketing of agricultural products is concerned.1 The main role of governments should be to provide conditions which are conducive to increasing agricultural productivity. Government should intrude, by appropriate policies and actions, to prevent undesirable distortions arising, for example, from employment-destroying technologies; an inequitable flow of the fruits of development to a limited group of beneficiaries; the monopsonistic domination of input delivery systems (of credit, fertiliser, extension advice, etc.) by a politically or economically dominant group; the appearance of external diseconomies, such as a changing farm structure which diminishes the size or threatens the smallholder sector, or the creation of landlessness on a significant scale, by reducing the access of small farmers to land; or other situations which have a seriously deleterious social, economic or environmental impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. W. W. Cochrane, Agricultural Development Planning: Economic Concepts, Administrative Procedures and Political Process, (Praeger, 1974). The author criticised Cochrane (in a review in Economic Development and Cultural Change vol.25 (1977) no.2) for putting forward this same theme; a criticism which is now regretted.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Uma Lele, ‘On Developing Rural Settlements’, Finance and Development, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Chambers, Managing Rural Development, (Uppsala: 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. W. Ruttan, ‘Integrated Rural Development Programmes: A Sceptical Perspective’, International Development Review, vol.17 (1975) no. 4. and I. Livingstone, ‘On the Concept of “Integrated Rural Development Planning” in Less Developed Countries’, J. of agric. Econs. vol.13 (1979) no.1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. D. Gwyer, Plantations and Development (mimeo) (1982), a paper read to the Tropical Agricultural Association: ‘I think it is no secret that integrated rural development has gone out of fashion. The World Development Report (1982) makes this clear. Integrated RD projects have tended to fail because of management constraints, a lack of tested agricultural packages and overly complex objectives requiring a degree of coordination among government agencies that has proved impossible to achieve in practice. There has been a confusion between what has been desirable and what is feasible’. Also World Bank, IDA in Retrospect, (Oxford University Press, 1982) p.37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The World Bank, Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Agenda for Action, (Washington: 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. S. Clayton, ‘Programming Rural Employment Opportunities in Kenya’, International Labour Review, vo1.112 (1975) nos 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Gittinger, Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects, 2nd edn (London: 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. M. Little and J. A. Mirrlees, Project Appraisal and Planning for Less Developed Countries (London: Heineman, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Squire and H. van der Tak, Economic Analysis of Projects (Washington: 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Kornai, The Unreal Neo-Classical Basis for Project Planning (mimeo) (Rome: FAO, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Cairncross (ed.) Employment, Income Distribution and Development Strategy: Problems of the Developing Countries (London: 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. S. Clayton, Agricultural Employment Creation and Smallholder Rubber Production in Sumatra, Occasional Paper No.2 (Agrarian Development Unit, Wye College, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. P. Collinson, Economic Considerations of Tree Crop Development on Smallholdings (mimeo) (Commonwealth Development Corporation, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Howell, ‘Assessing Management and Organisations for Agricultural Development Projects’, Institutions, Management and Agricultural Development, Occasional Paper No.3 (ODI, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taken from E. S. Clayton, A Comparative Study of Settlement Schemes in Kenya, Occasional Paper No.3 (Wye College, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Chambers and J. Moris (eds) Mwea: An Irrigated Rice Settlement in Kenya, Part 2E (Munich: Weltforum Verlag, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid. p.158.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid. p.161.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Eric Clayton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clayton, E. (1983). The Project Approach to Development. In: Agriculture, Poverty and Freedom in Developing Countries. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17297-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics