Abstract
The distinguishing characteristic of that set of assets which may be described as money is that they perform the function of a medium of exchange. This definition does not, however, allow for a clear-cut distinction in practice between those assets which should be regarded as money, and those which cannot be so treated. Cash and cheques drawn on banks are the means of payment for transactions which are generally acceptable in most developed economies, and this fact has led many to conclude that cash and demand deposits in banks are the only real monetary assets. There are, however, certain demand deposits, for example compensating balances held with banks in the USA, which cannot be freely used for transactions purposes. On the other hand, possession of a balance on time deposit, or access to overdraft facilities, may allow a purchaser to draw a cheque on his bank account even when he has insufficient demand deposits to meet that cheque. A more fundamental point is that the set of assets which is acceptable as payment for transactions is not immutable over time; it has changed in the past and could do so again in the future. If people should find it economically advantageous to accept, and to proffer, other financial claims in payment for transactions, then the set of assets which is to be described as money will alter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References for Appendix 1
Andersen, L.C. and Jordan, J.L., ‘Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stabilisation’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Monthly Review, November 1968.
Ando, Albert and Modigliani, Franco, ‘The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier’, American Economic Review, September 1965, pp. 693–728. See also other papers on the subject in the same issue.
Artis, M. J. and Nobay, A. R., ‘Two aspects of the monetary debate’, National Institute Economic Review, August 1969, pp. 33–51.
Bank of England, Appendix 2 (pp. 55–63 of this volume).
Barrett, C. K. and Walters, A. A., ‘The stability of Keynesian and monetary multipliers in the United Kingdom’, Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1966, pp. 395–405.
Bronfenbrenner, Martin and Mayer, Thomas, ‘Liquidity functions in the American economy’, Econometrica, October 1980, pp. 810–34.
Brunner, Karl and Meltzer, A. H., ‘Some further investigations of demand and supply functions for money’, Journal of Finance, May 1964, pp. 240–83.
Burstein, M. L., Economic Theory: Equilibrium and Change, Wiley, London, 1968, esp. pp. 289–326.
Chow, G. C., ‘On the long-run and short-run demand for money’, Journal of Political Economy, April 1966, pp. 111–31.
Christ, C. F., ‘Interest rates and “portfolio selection” among liquid assets in the US’, Studies in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld, Stanford University Press, 1963.
Courchene, T. J. and Shapiro, H. T., ‘The demand for money: a note from the time series’, Journal of Political Economy, October 1964, pp. 498–503.
Davis, R. G., ‘How much does money matter?’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Monthly Review, June 1969.
Fisher, Douglas, ‘The demand for money in Britain: quarterly results 1951–67’, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, December 1968, pp. 329–44.
Frazer, W. J., ‘The demand for money, statistical results and monetary policy’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, March 1967.
Friedman, Milton, ‘The quantity theory of money: a restatement’, Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, ed. M. Friedman, University of Chicago Press; 1956, pp. 3–21.
Friedman, Milton, ‘The demand for money: some theoretical and empirical results’, Journal of Political Economy, August 1959, pp. 327–51.
Friedman, Milton, ‘The demand for money: some theoretical and empirical results’, Journal of Political Economy, August 1959, p. 347.
Friedman, Milton and Meiselman, David, ‘The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier in the United States, 1897–1958’, in Stabilization Policies, CMC Research Papers, Prentice-Hall, 1964, pp. 165–268.
Friedman, Milton and Schwartz, A. J., A Monetary History of the United States 1867–1960, Princeton University Press, 1963.
Goldberger, A. S., Econometric Theory, Wiley, New York, 1966, pp. 197–200.
Hamburger, M. J., ‘The demand for money by households, money substitutes, and monetary policy’, Journal of Political Economy, December 1966, pp. 600–23.
Heller, H. R., ‘The demand for money: the evidence from the short-run data’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1965, pp. 291–303.
Johnson, H. G., ‘Recent developments in monetary theory: a commentary’, in Money in Britain, eds. D. R. Croome and H. G. Johnson, Oxford University Press, 1970, pp. 83–114.
Kavanagh, N. J. and Walters, A. A., ‘Demand for money in the UK 1877–1961: some preliminary findings’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics, May 1966, pp. 93–116.
Laidler, David, ‘The rate of interest and the demand for money-some empirical evidence’, Journal of Political Economy, December 1966, pp. 543–55.
Laidler, David and Parkin, Michael, ‘The demand for money in the United Kingdom 1956–67: preliminary estimates’, University of Essex Discussion Paper, unpublished.
Latané, H. A., ‘Cash balances and the interest rate: a pragmatic approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1954.
Latané, H. A., ‘Income velocity and interest rates: a pragmatic approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1960.
Lee, T. H., ‘Alternative interest rates and the demand for money: the empirical evidence’, American Economic Review, December 1967, pp. 1168–81.
Leeuw, Frank de and Kalchbrenner, John, ‘Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stabilisation—comment’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Monthly Review, April 1969.
Meltzer, A. H., ‘The demand for money: the evidence from time series’, Journal of Political Economy, June 1963, pp. 219–46.
Motley, Brian, ‘A demand-for-money function for the household sector-some preliminary findings’, Journal of Finance, December 1967, pp. 405–18.
Radcliffe Report, Report of the Committee on the Working of the Monetary System, Cmnd 827, August 1959, para. 392.
Teigen, R. L., ‘Demand and supply functions for money in the United States: some structural estimates’, Econometrica, October 1964, pp. 476–509.
Tobin, James, ‘The monetary interpretation of history’, American Economic Review, June 1965, pp. 464–85.
Copyright information
© 1984 C. A. E. Goodhart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodhart, C.A.E. (1984). The Importance of Money. In: Monetary Theory and Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-36060-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17295-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)